MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389040932 · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2023.3337088

Self-Supervised Learning for 3-D Point Clouds Based on a Masked Linear Autoencoder

2023· article· en· W4389040932 on OpenAlexafffund
Hongxin Yang, Ruisheng Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAutoencoderComputer sciencePoint cloudInferenceArtificial intelligenceTime complexityDeep learningPattern recognition (psychology)Algorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Motivated by the success of a masked autoencoder in three-dimensional (3D) point cloud-based learning, this study proposes an innovative framework for self-supervised learning on 3D point clouds with linear complexity. In the proposed framework, every input point cloud is divided into multiple point patches, which are randomly masked at different ratios. Then, unmasked point patches are then fed to an improved Transformer model, which uses an advanced linear self-attention mechanism autoencoder to learn high-level features. The pre-training objective is to recover the masked patches under the guidance of the unmasked point patches’ features obtained by the designed Transformer. Further, a linear self-attention mechanism is designed to use three projection matrices to decompose the original scaled dot-product attention into smaller parts, using the properties of low-rank and linear decomposition to reduce the time complexity from quadratic to linear. The results of extensive experiments demonstrate that the proposed pre-trained model can achieve high accuracy of 93.6% and 84.77% on the ModelNet40 and ScanObjectNN datasets, respectively, at a masking ratio of 40%. In addition, the results show that the proposed method, which uses a linear self-attention mechanism, can enhance the computational efficiency by significantly reducing inference time and minimizing the storage memory requirements for <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Q</i> , <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">K</i> , and <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">V</i> (Query, Key, and Value) matrices compared with the existing methods. Finally, the results indicate that the proposed method can achieve state-of-the-art performance on the classification ModelNet40 dataset.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.831
Threshold uncertainty score0.643

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote SensingSame topic3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207