MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389048841 · doi:10.35774/sf2023.02.125

ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL SECURITY RESEARCH VECTORS: BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS AND VISUALIZATION

2023· article· en· W4389048841 on OpenAlex
Svitlana Chorna

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueWORLD OF FINANCE · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Issues in Ukraine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScopusIdentification (biology)BibliometricsWeb of scienceData scienceField (mathematics)FinancePolitical scienceComputer scienceBusinessLibrary science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction. Bibliometric analysis allows the identification of major trends and priority research areas, as well as the identification of reputable scientists and their contribution to the field. Using the software package VOSviewer v.1.6.14, we analysed the common use of keywords in publications and the identification of partner countries, selecting the two most popular scientific databases Scopus and Web of Science as search tools. The purpose of the article is to identify trends and vectors of scientific research on financial security in order to identify the main directions in related fields. The bibliometric analysis of publications related to finance, economics and security made it possible to identify areas of research in this field and to formulate a quality policy aimed at strengthening national security and improving economic regulation. Results. With the development of technology and the globalisation of the information environment, the number of studies on the topic has increased. The number of relevant research indicators was taken from the Scopus database - 1970 literature, WoS - 1936.. Financial security is studied in several disciplines. According to the Scopus database, the most relevant fields are social sciences, economics, econometrics and finance. According to WoS, financial security is studied within the field of business and finance. Results are also provided for the most cited publications. Researchers from the USA, UK, China, Canada, Australia, Ukraine and Germany have contributed most to the development of this field. The results of the bibliometric analysis showed that there were 8 data clusters from the Scopus database and 11 data clusters from the WoS database. Conclusions. The study revealed the growing interest of the scientific community in the analysis of financial security issues. The direction of scientific research leads to the conclusion that financial security affects all areas of the economic environment and quality of life. A bibliometric analysis of publications by keywords shows that the concept of financial security is often associated with other concepts. This shows that the concept often coincides with categories such as economy, security, environment, etc. The results obtained allow us to determine the vector of focus for further assessment of the country’s financial security.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesBibliometrics
Consensus categoriesBibliometrics
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score0.847

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.1620.391
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it