فعالية برنامج تدريبي قائم على نظرية جولمان للذكاء الوجداني في خفض بعض أعراض الألكسيثيميا لدى المراهقين من تلاميذ المرحلة الإعدادية
Bibliographic record
Abstract
المنصــورة جامعـة التربية كليـــة ـــ للذكاء جوملان وظزية علي قائم تدريبي بزوامج فعالية لدى األلكسيثيميا أعزاض بعض خفض يف الوجداوي اإلعدادية املزحلة تالميذ مه املزاهقني إعـداد محمد الشحات محمد أيمن النفسية الصحة بقسم ماجستير باحث التربية كلية المنصورة جامعة إشراف الشورى الموافى حامد فؤاد أ.د. راضي محمد محمد فوقيه أ.د. 535 (12.42).With a standard deviation of (0.542), they were randomly distributed into two equal groups: an experimental group (11) students, and a control group (11) students.Toronto School of Alexithymia "Affectional Dullness" for Adolescents and Adults "TAS-20" Prepared by Taylor, Bagby, and Barkar (1994) and codified by Aladdin Kafafi, Fouad Muhammad Al-Dawash, and Mustafa Abdel-Mohsen Al-Hudaybi (2020), and the training program based on Goleman's theory of intelligence Affective, and the researcher used the following statistical methods in analyzing the data: Mann and Whitney test (U) to indicate the differences between two independent groups, and the Wilcoxon test -Wilcoxon rank signal and the value of (Z) to indicate the differences between two related samples.Some symptoms of alexithymia, and the presence of statistically significant differences between the mean scores of the students of the experimental and control groups in the post-test on the alexithymia scale in favor of the control group, and the presence of statistically significant differences between the mean ranks of the scores of the experimental group students in the pre and post measurements on the alexithymia scale in favor of the pre-measurement.There are no statistically significant differences between the mean scores of the experimental group students i n the post and foll ow -up measurements on the al exit hymi a scale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.051 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".