MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389065791 · doi:10.7202/1106960ar

L’inclusion d’une diversité de voix au coeur d’une démarche d’évaluation participative : retombées pour un organisme communautaire oeuvrant avec des femmes survivantes de l’exploitation sexuelle

2023· article· fr· W4389065791 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Joëlle Gauvin-Racine, Geneviève Olivier-d’Avignon, Pascaline Lebrun, Lucie Gélineau

Bibliographic record

VenueReflets Revue d’intervention sociale et communautaire · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicParticipatory Visual Research Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’inclusion d’une diversité de voix au coeur d’une démarche d’évaluation participative : retombées pour un organisme communautaire oeuvrant avec des femmes survivantes de l’exploitation sexuelle. Un article de la revue Reflets (Au-delà de la reddition de compte : l’évaluation dans les organismes communautaires et d’économie sociale) diffusée par la plateforme Érudit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.040
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.046
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score0.210

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0400.046
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.006
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.009
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.451
GPT teacher head0.547
Teacher spread0.096 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
DomainMethods
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReflets Revue d’intervention sociale et communautaireSame topicParticipatory Visual Research MethodsFrench-language works237,207