Peran Resiliensi Terhadap Quarter Life Crisis Pada Dewasa Awal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to determine the role of resilience to Quarter Life Crisis in young adults. Excessive feeling of helplessness, confusion, and uncertainty in facing life events are called Quarter Life (Robbins & Wilner, 2001). Resilience is known to be one of the factors that influence Quarter Life Crisis. This study is a quantitative research using survey method and purposive sampling techniques for sampling to 107 young adults within the range of 21—25 years old consists of 22 men and 85 women. Data analysis used a simple linear regression. This research uses two scale, Quarter Life Crisis scale by Agustin (2012) that later on be tryout by Wijaya dan Utami (2021) and resilience scale by Asad dan Hafnidar (2023). Data analysis is using the help of IBM SPSS 27 for Windows software. The results showed that there is a role of resilience towards Quarter Life Crisis in young adults. Effect size from resilience towards Quarter Life Crisis is 22,6%, while the rest (77,4%) is affected by other variables that are not studied in this research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".