MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389069214 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3408644/v1

Widely tunable solid-state source of single-photons matching an atomic transition

2023· preprint· en· W4389069214 on OpenAlexafffund
Rubayet Al Maruf, Sreesh Venuturumilli, Divya Bharadwaj, Paul Anderson, Jiawei Qiu, Yujia Yuan, Mohd Zeeshan, Behrooz Semnani, Philip J. Poole, Dan Dalacu, Kevin J. Resch, Michael E. Reimer, Michal Bajcsy

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum optics and atomic interactions
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada First Research Excellence FundIndustry Canada
KeywordsSolid-statePhotonMatching (statistics)Single-photon sourceTransition (genetics)State (computer science)PhysicsMaterials scienceAtomic physicsOptoelectronicsNanotechnologyChemistryEngineering physicsOpticsComputer scienceAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Hybrid quantum technologies aim to combine diverse quantum systems, mirroring classical computers' integration of electronic, photonic, magnetic, and mechanical components. Quantum dots in semiconductor nanowires emit high-purity, deterministic single photons with high repetition, while atomic ensembles offer photon storage and strong optical nonlinearities controllable by single photons. To interface quantum dots with atomic ensembles successfully, precise optical frequency matching of these two platforms is crucial. We demonstrate a simple, precise, reversible, broad-range, and local method for controlling the emission frequency of individual quantum dots embedded in tapered semiconductor nanowires. We then interface the quantum dots with an atomic ensemble via single-photons matched to hyperfine transitions and slow-light regions of the cesium D1-line. Our approach allows linking atomic and solid-state quantum systems and can potentially also be applied to other types of nanowire-embedded solid-state emitters, as well as for creating devices based on multiple solid-state emitters tuned to produce indistinguishable photons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicQuantum optics and atomic interactionsFrench-language works237,207