MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389086456 · doi:10.1016/j.esmorw.2023.10.001

ESMO Guidance for Reporting Oncology real-World evidence (GROW)

2023· article· en· W4389086456 on OpenAlexaff
Luís Castelo-Branco, Anna Pellat, Diogo Martins-Branco, Antonios Valachis, Jeroen W. G. Derksen, Karijn P.M. Suijkerbuijk, Urania Dafni, Tereza Dellaporta, Arndt Vogel, Arsela Prelaj, Rolf H. H. Groenwold, Henrique Martins, Rolf A. Stahel, Judith M. Bliss, Jakob Nikolas Kather, Nuria Ribelles, Francesco Perrone, Peter S Hall, Rodrigo Dienstmann, Christopher M. Booth, George Pentheroudakis, Suzette Delaloge, Miriam Koopman

Bibliographic record

VenueESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreToronto General HospitalUniversity of TorontoQueen's UniversityUniversity Health Network
FundersEuropean Society for Medical Oncology
KeywordsReal world evidenceMultidisciplinary approachExpert opinionMedicineKey (lock)Medical educationOncologyPolitical scienceInternal medicineComputer scienceIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

•Real-world evidence in oncology is evolving rapidly with many particularities.•This guidance provides key recommendations for reporting real-world evidence studies in oncology.•Recommendations are based on a review of current evidence and the authors' collective expert opinion.•Authors are a multidisciplinary group of experts from different institutions and countries.•Guidance is provided for full article development, including title, introduction, methods, results, discussion, conclusion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.114
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.518
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Reporting · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.886
Threshold uncertainty score0.601

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1140.518
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.014
Bibliometrics0.0210.022
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0150.012
Open science0.0100.011
Research integrity0.0150.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1510.100

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.671
GPT teacher head0.548
Teacher spread0.123 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainReporting
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueESMO Real World Data and Digital OncologySame topicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207