MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389102590 · doi:10.1121/10.0022902

Transient sounds of hydrothermal vents

2023· article· en· W4389102590 on OpenAlexaffabout
Brendan Smith, David R. Barclay

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Waves and Analysis
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrothermal ventGeologyHydrophoneObservatorySeismologyHydrothermal circulationAcousticsAccelerometerSeismometerTransient (computer programming)Seismic waveOceanographyComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transient acoustic signals were recently detected at the Main Endeavour Hydrothermal Vent Field which are believed to be generated by both geological and biological sources, including vent chimney collapse, impulsive geological signals, fish grunts, and snapping. These signals provide an opportunity for long-term passive acoustic monitoring of hydrothermal vent activity and ecology. This method offers advantages of longevity and robustness compared with other monitoring techniques, as the sensor can remain a safe distance away from the high-temperature, caustic vent fluid. Utilizing recordings from a bottom-mounted hydrophone on Ocean Networks Canada’s NEPTUNE observatory, a detector was implemented to identify and classify these signals in more than one year of acoustic data after 2016. While only a single hydrophone is available at this site, an array of three seismic accelerometers also on the NEPTUNE observatory was used to localize transient events when sufficient signal-to-noise ratio was available to provide confidence in the location estimate. Correlation of the transient sounds with seismic activity at the vent field was also evaluated, suggesting that passive acoustic monitoring can augment seismic records to provide additional information regarding geological activity at hydrothermal vent sites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicSeismic Waves and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207