MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389109956 · doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2023.110263

Algebraic actions I. C*-algebras and groupoids

2023· article· en· W4389109956 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Chris Bruce, Xin Li

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Functional Analysis · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Operator Algebra Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsH2020 European Research CouncilHorizon 2020European Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEuropean Commission
KeywordsMathematicsDouble groupoidCommutative propertyAlgebraic numberPure mathematicsAction (physics)Linear subspaceInverse semigroupClass (philosophy)SemigroupAlgebra over a fieldAlgebraic structureInvariant (physics)Computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Given an algebraic action of a semigroup, we construct an inverse semigroup, and we characterize Hausdorffness, topological freeness, and minimality of the associated tight groupoid in terms of conditions on the initial algebraic action. We parameterize all closed invariant subspaces of the unit space of our groupoid, and characterize topological freeness of the associated reduction groupoids. We prove that our groupoids are purely infinite whenever they are minimal, which answers a general open question in the affirmative for our special class of groupoids. In the topologically free case, we prove that the concrete C*-algebra associated with the algebraic action is always a (possibly exotic) groupoid C*-algebra in the sense that it sits between the full and essential C*-algebras of our groupoid. This provides a framework for studying such concrete C*-algebras, allowing us to obtain structural results that were only previously available for very special classes of algebraic actions. For instance, we obtain results on simplicity and pure infiniteness for C*-algebras associated with subshifts over semigroups, actions coming from commutative algebra, and non-commutative rings. These results were out of reach using existing techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.153
Threshold uncertainty score0.817

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Functional AnalysisSame topicAdvanced Operator Algebra ResearchFrench-language works237,207