MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389117824 · doi:10.1016/j.sbsr.2023.100613

A novel and intelligent chemometric-electrochemical-enzymatic biosensing procedure and mimicking a clinical condition environment to trick the red blood cells for counting them under physiological conditions: A new connection among chemometry, electrochemistry and hematology

2023· article· en· W4389117824 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSensing and Bio-Sensing Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicElectrochemical Analysis and Applications
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersKermanshah University of Medical Sciences
KeywordsBiosensorPartial least squares regressionAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Materials scienceNafionChemistryPyrolytic carbonBiological systemElectrodeElectrochemistryChromatographyNanotechnologyComputer scienceMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Here, a novel electrochemical biosensing procedure has been developed for determination of the number of red blood cells (RBCs) under physiochemical conditions based on chemometric modeling of hydrodynamic differential pulse voltammetric (HDPV), and amperometric data as responses of a modified edge plane pyrolytic graphite electrode (EPPGE). In order to obtain a good sensitivity from the EPPGE, its surface was modified with a thin layer of multiwalled carbon nanotubes-ionic liquid (MWCNTs-IL). Catalase (CAT) was immobilized onto the surface of MWCNTs-IL/EPPGE with help of nafion. The response of the biosensor was based on electrochemical reduction of oxygen of the blood samples which was enhanced by a trick based on addition of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) to blood samples which can be reduced by the CAT to produce extra oxygen. Prior to experiments, the solution in electrochemical cell was bubbled with pure N2 to purge the oxygen in the solution, but in order to increase the selectivity of the biosensor towards detection of the oxygen obtained from the red blood cells, voltammetric responses of the biosensor were modeled by multivariate chemometric calibration methods with the help of radial basis function-partial least squares (RBF-PLS), least squares-support vector machines (LS-SVM), recursive weighted partial least squares (rPLS), ant colony optimization-mathematical pre-processing selection by genetic algorithm-sample selection through a distance-based procedure-partial least squares-1 (ACO-GA-SS-PLS1), and radial basis function-artificial neural networks (RBF-ANN) to select the best method for determination of the number of the RBCs. The results confirmed the amperometric methods modeled by RBF-ANN showed the best performance for supporting the biosensor in determination of the number of the RBCs with a performance which had an excellent compatibility with the results of a hemocytometer. The results of this study as the newest application of chemometric-electrochemical methods can make a strong connection among electrochemists, chemometricians and hematologists to expand their collaborations on determination of blood factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it