AlphaFold modeling of nepovirus 3C-like proteinases provides new insights into their diverse substrate specificities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The majority of picornaviral 3C proteinases (3Cpro) cleavage sites possess glutamine at the P1 position. Plant nepovirus 3C-like proteinases (3CLpro) show however much broader specificity, cleaving not only after glutamine, but also after several basic and hydrophobic residues. To investigate this difference, we employed AlphaFold to generate structural models of twelve selected 3CLpro, representing six substrate specificities. Generally, we observed favorable correlations between the architecture and charge of nepovirus proteinase S1 subsites and their ability to accept or restrict larger residues. The models identified a conserved aspartate residue close to the P1 residue in the S1 subsites of all nepovirus proteinases examined, consistent with the observed strong bias against negatively-charged residues at the P1 position of nepovirus cleavage sites. Finally, a cramped S4 subsite along with the presence of two unique histidine and serine residues explains the strict requirement of the grapevine fanleaf virus proteinase for serine at the P4 position.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".