On the Uses of Keeping a Notebook: Autobiographical Narrative Inquiry and Marion Milner’s A Life of One’s Own
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 1934, Marion Milner, writing under the pseudonym Joanna Field, published A Life of One’s Own, reflecting on her seven-year undertaking of keeping a diary aimed at answering the question, what makes me happy? The diary itself is not the text of the work. Rather, A Life of One’s Own forms a research text that anticipates contemporary autobiographical narrative inquiry. Recognizing narrative inquiry’s grounding in John Dewey’s 1930s theories of experience, this paper explores the ways in which, first, experience is explicitly valued in the text and, second, the ways in which the text provides evidence that diary or notebook keeping can serve as an important process in autobiographical narrative inquiry. The author concludes the paper by offering reflections on some possible uses of notebook keeping for both narrative inquirers and educators. Key words: autobiographical narrative inquiry; Marion Milner; A Life of One’s Own; notebooks; diaries En 1934, Marion Milner, écrivant sous le pseudonyme de Joanna Field, a publié A Life of One’s Own, une réflexion sur les sept ans pendant lesquels elle a tenu un journal personnel dans le but de répondre à la question Qu’est-ce qui me rend heureuse? Le journal n’est pas le texte de l’œuvre; c’est plutôt A Life of One’s Own qui constitue le texte de recherche et qui préfigure l’enquête narrative autobiographique contemporaine. Reconnaissant le fondement de l’enquête narrative dans les pensées de John Dewey pendant le années 1930 sur l’expérience, cet article explore d’abord les façons dont le texte valorise explicitement l’expérience pour ensuite porter sur les façons dont le texte fournit des preuves que la tenue d’un journal ou d’un carnet peut servir de processus important dans l’enquête narrative autobiographique. L’auteure conclut en offrant des réflexions sur des emplois possibles de la tenue d’un journal, tant pour ceux qui entreprennent une enquête narrative que les éducateurs. Mots clés : Enquête narrative autobiographique; Marion Milner; A Life of One’s Own; carnets; journaux intimes
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.020 | 0.044 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.020 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".