Martini 3 Force Field Parameters for Protein Lipidation Post-Translational Modifications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Protein lipidations are vital co/post-translational modifications that tether lipid tails to specific protein amino acids, allowing them to anchor to biological membranes, switch their subcellular localization, and modulate association with other proteins. Such lipidations are thus crucial for multiple biological processes including signal transduction, protein trafficking, and membrane localization and are implicated in various diseases as well. Examples of lipid-anchored proteins include the Ras family of proteins that undergo farnesylation; actin and gelsolin that are myristoylated; phospholipase D that is palmitoylated; glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins; and others. Here, we develop parameters for cysteine-targeting farnesylation, geranylgeranylation, and palmitoylation, as well as glycine-targeting myristoylation for the latest version of the Martini 3 coarse-grained force field. The parameters are developed using the CHARMM36m all-atom force field parameters as reference. The behavior of the coarse-grained models is consistent with that of the all-atom force field for all lipidations and reproduces key dynamical and structural features of lipid-anchored peptides, such as the solvent-accessible surface area, bilayer penetration depth, and representative conformations of the anchors. The parameters are also validated in simulations of the lipid-anchored peripheral membrane proteins Rheb and Arf1, after comparison with independent all-atom simulations. The parameters, along with mapping schemes for the popular martinize2 tool, are available for download at 10.5281/zenodo.7849262 and also as supporting information.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.061 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".