High Energy Density Welding of IN792 Ds Superalloy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ni base superalloys are commonly employed in the industrial fields of aerospace, automotive and energy production due to their excellent mechanical properties and corrosion resistance at high temperature. Superficial defects and cracks may occur during both manufacturing process of components and their service life. High energy density welding techniques, electron beam (EBW) and laser beam (LBW) welding, can be used to create efficient repairs. Joints, obtained by EBW and LBW of IN792 directionally solidified (DS) superalloy, have been investigated to determine the presence of defects, and evaluate the mechanical properties related to specific microstructural features. The results showed that a pre-heating temperature (PHT) higher than 200 °C is always necessary to prevent the formation of hot cracks in the molten zone (MZ) and heat affected zone (HAZ). The process parameters have been optimized to get a good quality of the seams (lack of macro-defects, a good penetration depth and width). Some preliminary test of post-welding heat treatments (PWHTs) have been investigated to homogenize as far as possible the microstructure and the mechanical properties across the seams. The results obtained by the two techniques, EBW and LBW, have been compared and discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it