MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389153469 · doi:10.55016/ojs/ajer.v65i4.56554

Preparing Pre-service Teachers to Support Children With Refugee Experiences

2019· article· en· W4389153469 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Thursica Kovinthan Levi

Bibliographic record

VenueAlberta Journal of Educational Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and experiences of immigrants and refugees
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefugeePedagogyTeacher educationContext (archaeology)SociologyPsychologyLibrary sciencePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Within the Canadian context, there is limited understanding of the attitudes and perspectives of pre-service teachers’ preparedness to support students with refugee experiences. Using a trauma-informed and culturally responsive approach to pedagogy, this study documents the perspectives of 33 pre-service teachers on their preparation to teach students with refugee experiences in one teacher education program in Canada. Results demonstrate that although pre-service teachers recognize the needs of refugee students, they noted that they have few opportunities in their courses or practicums that address how to meet these needs. They identified training in trauma-informed practices, parent communication, and recognizing and understanding students with refugee experiences as gaps in their preparation. Key Words: trauma-informed; pre-service teacher education; teacher education programs; refugee children Dans le contexte canadien, nous connaissons peu sur les attitudes et les perspectives qu’ont les étudiants se destinant à l’enseignement relatives à leur état de préparation pour appuyer les élèves réfugiés. Reposant sur une approche qui tient compte des traumatismes et des réalités culturelles, cette étude fait état des perspectives de 33 étudiants dans un programme de formation des enseignants au Canada quant à leur état de préparation à enseigner à des élèves réfugiés. Les résultats indiquent que si les étudiants se destinant à l’enseignement reconnaissent les besoins des élèves réfugiés, ils constatent que leurs cours et leurs stages leur offrent peu d’occasions d’apprendre comment répondre à ces besoins. Comme lacunes dans leur préparation, les étudiants ont identifié la formation en pratiques tenant compte des traumatismes, la communication avec les parents, ainsi que la reconnaissance et la compréhension de la réalité des réfugiés. Mots clés : qui tient compte des traumatismes; formation des enseignants; programmes de formation des enseignants; enfants réfugiés

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: yes
Not applicablelow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Other designlow
models splitAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.721
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.386 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.

The models disagree on parts of this classification; every voice is preserved in the section at the end of the page.

Study designNot applicable · Other design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlberta Journal of Educational ResearchSame topicEducation and experiences of immigrants and refugeesFrench-language works237,207