Design and Prototyping of a Novel Toroidal Magnet System for MOLLER Experiment at Jefferson Lab
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (JLab) has designed a unique spectrometer system to measure the weak interaction between electrons. The experiment— Measurement of Lepton-Lepton Electroweak Reaction (MOLLER)—requires leveraging the recent 12 GeV electron beam upgrade and will run in JLab for three years. Focusing the signal for the MOLLER experiment requires five water-cooled toroidal magnets, each with unique geometry and with 7-fold symmetry. The five magnets operate in a vacuum and provide the magnetic field required to separate the incident beam electrons scattered from the target electrons (Møller scattering) and protons (elastic e-p scattering) in a liquid hydrogen target. The conceptual design was developed by the MOLLER Collaboration and was given to JLab in the form of amp turns and physical location, with additional physics requirements. This paper presents prototyping of the coils and magnet support system and discusses the lessons learned during the process along with the plans for full magnet testing and installation. The JLab Magnet Group along with the MOLLER Collaboration developed the specification document that includes keep out zones to design the set of magnets. JLab contracted the design of the first toroid magnet (TM0) of the magnet system to Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The other four toroid magnets (TM1 through TM4) have been designed by JLab and are in the process of fabrication and assembly. Prototype coils of TM1-TM4 were fabricated by Everson-Tesla Incorporated, PA (USA). This paper presents the unique challenges of the design, alignment, high current density, operating range, high radiation dose, and vacuum environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".