MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389164402 · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3337823

Dual-Layer Metamaterial Rectangular Antenna Arrays for In-Band Full-Duplex Massive MIMO

2023· article· en· W4389164402 on OpenAlexafffund
Yuanzhe Gong, Mobeen Mahmood, Robert Morawski, Tho Le‐Ngoc

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFull-Duplex Wireless Communications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHuawei Technologies
KeywordsMulti-band deviceMetamaterialMIMODuplex (building)Materials scienceAntenna (radio)OptoelectronicsComputer scienceTelecommunicationsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a prototype pair of dual-layer electromagnetic bandgap slotted circularly polarized patch 8x8Tx/8x8Rx orthogonally-polarized antenna arrays designed for in-band full-duplex massive MIMO. The design processes of the antenna array, beamforming feeding network, and beam steering algorithms are discussed. The proposed prototype operates in a bandwidth of 250 MHz (or 7.1% at 3.5 GHz) from 3.35 GHz to 3.6 GHz. Using orthogonal Tx/Rx polarization, an average mutual coupling between any two Tx and Rx antenna elements of -49.2 dB can be achieved. Further improvement in Tx-to-Rx isolation at the beam level can be achieved with the two proposed beamforming schemes. Illustrative results using Tx/Rx 1x4 sub-arrays indicate the formed beams with an average mutual coupling of -65.6 dB between any two Tx and Rx beams (i.e., an improvement of 16.4 dB in Tx/Rx isolation). The sample Tx and Rx far-field beam patterns, radiation null depth and position, and corresponding Tx-to-Rx mutual coupling levels are investigated, which gives insight into the beamforming isolation improvement design. Within a steering range from -50 to 50 degrees, a directivity over 10.7 dB, a 3dB-beamwidth narrower than 33.0 degrees, and a normalized sidelobe level lower than -9.0 dB are achieved. Simulation and measurement results on the mutual coupling, beamforming directivity, beamwidth, and radiation patterns in various scenarios are investigated and found to be in good agreement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicFull-Duplex Wireless CommunicationsFrench-language works237,207