Evidence for Mixed Mg Coordination Environments in Silicate Glasses: Results from <sup>25</sup>Mg NMR Spectroscopy at 35.2 T
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The Mg–O coordination environment of silicate glasses of composition CaMgSi 2 O 6, Na 2 MgSi 3 O 8, and K 2 MgSi 5 O 12 is probed using ultrahigh-field (35.2 T) 25 Mg magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance (MAS NMR) and triple-quantum MAS NMR spectroscopy. These spectra clearly reveal the coexistence of 4-fold- (Mg IV ) and 6-fold- (Mg VI ) coordinated Mg in all glasses. The Mg IV /Mg VI ratio implies an average Mg–O coordination number of ∼5 for CaMgSi 2 O 6 glass, bringing NMR results for the first time in good agreement with those reported in previous studies based on diffraction and X-ray absorption spectroscopy, thus resolving a decade-long controversy regarding Mg coordination in alkaline-earth silicate glasses. The Mg–O coordination number decreases to ∼4.5 in the alkali–Mg silicate glasses, indicating that Mg competes effectively with the low field strength alkali cations for the nonbridging oxygen in the structure to attain tetrahedral coordination. This work illustrates the promise of ultrahigh-field NMR spectroscopy in structural studies involving nuclides with low gyromagnetic ratio.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".