Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper studies a class of stochastic and time-varying Gaussian intersymbol interference (ISI) channels. The probability law for the$i^{th}$channel tap during time slot$t$is supported over an interval of centre$c_{i}$and radius$r_{i}$. The transmitter and the receiver only know the centres$c_{i}$and the radii$r_{i}$. The joint distribution for the array of channel taps and their realizations are unknown to both the transmitter and the receiver. A lower bound (achievability result) is presented on the channel capacity which results in an upper bound on the capacity loss compared to when all radii are zeros. The lower bound on the channel capacity saturates at a positive value as the maximum average input power$P$increases beyond what is referred to as the saturation power$P_{sat}$. Roughly speaking,$P_{sat}$is inversely proportional to the sum of the squares of the radii$r_{i}$. It is also verified that in the presence of channel state information at the receiver, if the so-called central channel frequency response is everywhere nonzero, then the aforementioned capacity loss is bounded from above by a constant that does not depend on$P$. A partial converse result is provided in a scenario where different channel taps vary independently of each other and each channel tap process is stationary with a finite differential entropy rate. It is shown that for every sequence of codebooks with vanishing probability of error, if the size of each symbol in every codeword is bounded away from zero by a constant that is proportional to$\sqrt {P}$, then the rate of that sequence of codebooks does not scale with$P$. Tools in matrix analysis such as matrix norms and Weyl’s inequality on perturbation of eigenvalues of symmetric matrices are used in order to analyze the probability of error. A result in the paper that may find other applications is a new and tight upper bound on the size of a Gaussian typical set.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".