Behind Closed Doors: Attitudes, Dark Traits, and Perceptions of Intimate Partner Sexual Violence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intimate partner sexual violence (IPSV) is characterized by sexual violence occurring within relationships. Undergraduates (N = 680) self-reported their attitudes, behaviours, and personality and were randomly assigned to read an IPSV vignette describing a scenario of heterosexual or homosexual IPSV. Results indicated that perpetration of IPSV, non-partner coercion, rape myth acceptance, sexual entitlement, narcissism, psychopathy, sadism, and gender were significantly related to perceptions of seriousness, perpetrator, and/or victim blame; however, participants perceived the severity and blame similarly across conditions. Rape myth acceptance, sexual entitlement, and psychopathy were significant predictors of IPSV perpetration. The results demonstrate how perceived norms may influence one to blame survivors experiencing IPSV, while endorsing rape myths may lead to trivialization and perpetration. The results provide evidence for the nested ecological model framework of IPSV; additionally, practical implications include more inclusive views of sexual minority groups and raising awareness of the characteristics of IPSV perpetrators.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".