Bibliographic record
Abstract
researched, and presented with the urgent questions of our present, in order to be effective as a place of knowledge formation and enchantment at the same time.For a museum must situate and communicate the artists not only in the contexts of their lives, but also in our own time.This publication is therefore also a basis and a starting point for asking more broadly how we can go beyond the boundaries of the archive and move towards other models of knowledge.What role do we assign to the archive and its reprocessing as a tool for imagining new futures, for building multi-layered collective knowledge through and with artists and thinkers, new art histories, curatorial practices, and documentation and display strategies?How can an awareness of the past, updated through an engagement with art and its contexts, which does not excuse but also does not absolutely demonize lead to a new sense of responsibility in our present?This publication is also to be understood as a handing over, as it were, in which a chorus of outstanding scholarly voices opens a new chapter for the institution with their work.As the Georg Kolbe Foundation and Museum, it is now necessary to make productive use of this often distressing basis, not only to research what was and to show what is, but also to imagine and shape what can be.The publication is therefore intended to serve as a compass, not only for the still incomplete indexing, classification, and visualization of new sources, or the deconstruction of the mechanisms of the process of coming to terms with the past in Germany that have been in effect for decades, but above all in the search for an institutional approach that is capable of critically grasping this process in all its complexity, which ranges from the artistic and cultural claim of universality to the abysses of colonialism.It also feeds on what the publicist Max Czollek recently called "inconsolability" in the face of what has happened and how it could have happened at all.With its emphasis on feeling, it forms an antipole to the sovereign claim of a self-centered German understanding of history.In its deliberately chosen sentimentality, the term also reaches deeply into the reappraisal of Georg Kolbe's life and work that this publication brings about.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".