MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389219195 · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2023.104443

Implementing precision methods in personalizing psychological therapies: Barriers and possible ways forward

2023· article· en· W4389219195 on OpenAlex
Anne‐Katharina Deisenhofer, Michael Barkham, Esther T. Beierl, Brian Schwartz, Katie Aafjes‐van Doorn, Christopher G. Beevers, Isabel M. Berwian, Simon E. Blackwell, Claudi Bockting, Eva‐Lotta Brakemeier, Gary Brown, Joshua E. J. Buckman, Louis G. Castonguay, Claire E. Cusack, Tim Dalgleish, Kim de Jong, Jaime Delgadillo, Robert J. DeRubeis, Ellen Driessen, Jill Ehrenreich–May, Aaron J. Fisher, Eiko I. Fried, Jessica Fritz, Toshi A. Furukawa, Claire M. Gillan, Juan Martín Gómez Penedo, Peter Hitchcock, Stefan G. Hofmann, Steven D. Hollon, Nicholas C. Jacobson, Daniel R. Karlin, Chi Tak Lee, Cheri A. Levinson, Lorenzo Lorenzo‐Luaces, Riley McDanal, Danilo Moggia, Mei Yi Ng, Lesley A. Norris, Vikram Patel, Marilyn L. Piccirillo, Stephen Pilling, Julian Rubel, Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo, Rob Saunders, Jessica L. Schleider, Paula P. Schnurr, Stephen M. Schueller, Greg J. Siegle, Rudolf Uher, Edward Watkins, Christian A. Webb, Shannon Wiltsey Stirman, Laure Wynants, Soo Jeong Youn, Sigal Zilcha‐Mano, Wolfgang Lutz, Zachary D. Cohen

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueBehaviour Research and Therapy · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMental Health Research Topics
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNIH Office of the DirectorNational Institute on Drug AbuseNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and AlcoholismWellcome LeapNational Center for Complementary and Integrative HealthMedical Research CouncilMinistry of Education, IndiaNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftEuropean CommissionAssociation for Psychological ScienceKlingenstein Third Generation FoundationIndiana Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteNational Institutes of HealthShionogiCanada Research ChairsBrain and Behavior Research FoundationTommy Fuss FundWashington University in St. LouisNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPersonalizationPsychologyPrecision medicinePsychotherapistApplied psychologyMedicineComputer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Personalizing psychological treatments involves the clinician's efforts to customize or modify treatment based on the individual's needs to enhance treatment outcomes. • Within the umbrella term “personalization”, the application of precision methods to clinical psychology has led to data-driven psychological therapies. • Implementing data-informed psychological therapies is a multifaceted endeavour that encompasses four main areas: Clinical and practical factors, technical aspects, statistical considerations, and contextual frameworks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.683
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.424
GPT teacher head0.617
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it