MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389226359 · doi:10.32098/mltj.04.2023.16

Association between Carpal Tunnel Cross-Sectional Area and Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2023· review· en· W4389226359 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMuscles Ligaments and Tendons Journal · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarpal tunnel syndromeMeta-analysisMedicineCross-sectional studyAssociation (psychology)Carpal tunnel releaseSurgeryPsychologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a prevalent peripheral compressive neuropathy. In addition to an enlargement of the median nerve cross-sectional area (CSA), the carpal tunnel CSA may be a determinant of CTS. However, the findings of studies assessing the association between carpal tunnel CSA and CTS are very limited and inconclusive. Purpose. The present systematic review aimed to execute a meta-analysis of present literature to establish evidence of the association between the carpal tunnel CSA at the proximal and distal levels and CTS. Methods. PICOS strategy was used to electronically search key terms in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and Wiley Online databases with no restrictions on the publication date for case-control and cohort studies. The bias risks for these studies were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan5 from Cochrane. A total of 13 studies comparing the association between CSA of the carpal tunnel at the proximal and distal levels and CTS between 428 CTS participants and 324 controls with a 145/249 male-to-female ratio and a mean age of 42.2 met the inclusion criteria. Results. Overall, the studies were rated as acceptable quality, having scored 4, 6, 7, or 8 (out of 9 stars) on the NOS. Meta-analysis of the included studies indicated that the overall pooled mean difference of CSA of the carpal tunnel at the proximal level was higher in the CTS groups when compared with the control groups (0.79; 95% (confidence interval) CI 0.63-0.96; p = 0.003). Similarly, the overall pooled mean difference of CSA of the carpal tunnel at the distal level was higher in CTS individuals when compared with controls (0.54; 90%CI 0.32-0.76; p = 0.32). Conclusions. This review found evidence that an increased CSA of the carpal tunnel at the proximal and distal levels is associated with CTS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.581
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.145
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it