MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract B046: Analyzing heterogeneity of tumor microenvironment of TNBC patients by meta-analysis of 7 breast cancer scRNAseq studies

2023· article· en· W4389227671 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kyung Soo Kim, Jee Hung Kim, Soong June Bae, Sung Gwe Ahn, Joon Jeong

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Immunology Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTumor microenvironmentStromal cellBreast cancerTriple-negative breast cancerCancer researchImmunotherapyImmune systemCD8MedicineEstrogen receptorImmune checkpointCancerT cellOncologyBiologyInternal medicineImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Breast cancer can be classified into several types. Among them, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is breast cancer that does not express estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Since targeted therapy for breast cancer relies on the three receptors, treatment outcomes have been worst in TNBCs. However, the clinical benefit of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with chemotherapy over chemotherapy alone was demonstrated in several trials, opening a new avenue for patients with metastatic PD-L1+ TNBC. After several studies with ICIs, researchers found that the tumor microenvironment affects the response rate of immunotherapies. Therefore, to unravel the heterogeneity of the tumor microenvironment of TNBC patients, we collected 7 public single-cell RNA sequencing breast cancer studies. From 141,068 cells populating tumors and tumor-microenvironment (TMEs), we first identified epithelial cells separately. Using whole cells including epithelial and immune-stromal cells, we identified the Baylor-proposed TNBC molecular subtype of each patient. This approach with epithelial cells revealed that 19 basal-like immune-activated (BLIA), 5 basal-like immune-suppressed (BLIS), 2 luminal-androgen receptor (LAR), 3 mesenchymal (MES), and 3 unclassified subtypes. By comparing cell number and cell-cell interactions, the heterogeneity of TME-consisting cell populations between the TNBC subtypes was analyzed. Analysis of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes revealed their difference in activation, expansion, and exhaustion programs across patients. Among the subtypes, the BLIA subtype had a greater amount of exhausted CD8+ T cells and regulatory T cells. This finding was consistent with cell-cell interaction analysis. In the case of the BLIA subtype, the interaction between regulatory T cells and CD8 T cells was more active than in other subtypes. Also, the interaction between cytotoxic cells (T cells and NK cells) and regulatory T cells were more active in the BLIA subtype. Additionally, tumor cells in the BLIA subtype seem to inhibit cytotoxic cells to a greater extent. Among the interactions between epithelial cells and exhausted CD8+ T cells, MDK interaction was higher in the BLIA subtype. Additionally, the expression of the MDK gene in endothelial cells and macrophages leads to upregulation in immune infiltration which causes more T cells in TME. Also, we found that the progression-free survival of patients differs due to the expression of the MDK gene. In conclusion, the MDK gene causes a T cell-enriched environment in TME, which leads to different progression-free survival. Citation Format: Kyungsoo Kim, Jee Hung Kim, Soong June Bae, Sung Gwe Ahn, Joon Jeong. Analyzing heterogeneity of tumor microenvironment of TNBC patients by meta-analysis of 7 breast cancer scRNAseq studies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy; 2023 Oct 1-4; Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2023;11(12 Suppl):Abstract nr B046.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.008
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.168
GPT teacher head0.437
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Immunology ResearchSame topicCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersFrench-language works237,207