FORTITUDE: A Phase 2 Open-Label Study in Progress to Evaluate Etavopivat for the Treatment of Anemia in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Most patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (LR-MDS) develop anemia and a high proportion of patients become dependent on red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. MDS-related anemia is associated with low hemoglobin (Hb) levels, iron overload and poor quality of life. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and other drugs, including lenalidomide, luspatercept and imetelstat (an investigational product), can lead to RBC transfusion independence and improve Hb levels in many patients; however, responses are generally transient and novel treatments are needed for this population. Etavopivat is an investigational, once-daily, selective erythrocyte pyruvate kinase (PKR) activator in development for the treatment of sickle cell disease (SCD) and anemia in patients with LR-MDS. In a phase 1 study in adult and adolescent patients with SCD by Saraf et al. HemaSphere. (2022), etavopivat 400 mg once daily was considered well tolerated and showed sustained Hb increases up to 12 weeks for most patients. Additional studies in healthy volunteers and patients with SCD support an acceptable safety profile together with improved RBC health and function during continuous treatment with etavopivat. In patients with LR-MDS, ineffective hematopoiesis may be due, in part, to insufficient ATP production, leading to increased erythroid lineage apoptosis. By activating PKR, etavopivat may improve RBC health and function by stimulating energy production (increasing ATP levels), increasing Hb levels (decreasing anemia), and decreasing erythroid lineage apoptosis. Aims:Describe the design of a multicenter, open-label, phase 2 study (FORTITUDE; NCT05568225) evaluating hematologic improvements in patients with very low-, low- and intermediate-risk MDS during treatment with etavopivat. Study design:Key eligibility criteria include age ≥18 years; very low-, low- and intermediate-risk MDS per the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System; and anemia defined by mean Hb <10.0 g/dL and <3 RBC transfusions <16 weeks prior to first dose for non-transfusion-dependent (NTD) patients or ≥3 units of RBCs for anemia <16 weeks prior to first dose for transfusion-dependent (TD) patients. Key exclusion criteria include MDS associated with del 5q cytogenetic abnormality and known TP53 abnormality, history of acute myeloid leukemia, and an absolute neutrophil count <0.5 × 10 9/L. Additional exclusion criteria include prior treatment with azacitidine; decitabine; erythropoietin, other hematopoietic growth factor treatment or lenalidomide within 30 days of Day 1 or anticipated to be required during the study; and luspatercept within 30 days of Day 1 for NTD patients and within 16 weeks of Day 1 for TD patients. Patients will receive etavopivat 400 mg once daily for at least 48 weeks. Treatment may be continued beyond 48 weeks in patients demonstrating clinical benefit. The primary objective of the study is to assess hematologic improvements based on an erythroid response over any continuous period ≥8 weeks within 24 weeks on etavopivat treatment in patients with LR-MDS. The primary endpoint will be based on the combined incidence of: ≥1.5 g/dL increase in Hb from baseline maintained for ≥8 consecutive weeks for NTD patients; absence of any transfusion for ≥8 consecutive weeks for low transfusion-burden patients; and reduction by ≥50% of RBC units for ≥8 consecutive weeks for high transfusion-burden patients. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic properties of etavopivat will be evaluated. FORTITUDE is open for enrollment in Canada, France, Germany, and the USA. Planned enrollment includes approximately 15 patients in each of the three transfusion requirement-based groups (Figure). Statistical analysis: The primary endpoint (pooled incidence) will be tested with a one-sided Fisher's exact test at the significance level of 0.025 where 0.2 is the assumed null proportion. Summary:Etavopivat is a novel, investigational, once-daily, selective PKR activator with the potential to improve RBC health and lifespan. This phase 2 study will assess the safety of etavopivat and its impact on Hb levels and RBC transfusion burden in patients with LR-MDS and anemia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".