MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4389234913 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-177740

Somatic TET2 Mutations Prime the Immune System for Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade

2023· article· en· W4389234913 on OpenAlexaff
Robert J. Vanner, Andy G.X. Zeng, Michelle Chan‐Seng‐Yue, Suraj Bansal, Elisa Donato, Liqing Jin, Sofia Genta, Enrique Sanz Garcia, Steven M. Chan, Andreas Trumpp, John E. Dick

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmune systemCancer researchImmune checkpointBiologyBone marrowCD8HaematopoiesisImmunotherapyImmunologyStem cellGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The driver mutations causing Hematopoietic Stem Cell (HSC) expansion in Clonal Hematopoiesis (CH) are inherited by HSC progeny and in some settings alter the function of mutant immune cells. It is unclear how CH mutations impact immune cell function in response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), which is a critical cancer therapy for many solid tumours and hematological cancers. Understanding how CH influences ICB could provide a novel biomarker for patient stratification or personalized therapeutics and may offer insight into immunotherapy mechanisms, yielding novel drug targets to synergistically improve patient outcomes. Somatic mutations inactivating TET2, which is responsible for 5-methylcytosine hydroxylation and demethylation, are one of the most frequent drivers of CH. TET2 inactivation can enhance inflammation from monocytes/macrophages, CD4 + and CD8 + T cells, but its impact on ICB is unknown. Here we sought to define the impact of TET2-mutant CH (TET2-CH) on ICB response. First, we modelled TET2-CH by rescuing lethally irradiated C57BL6/j mice with Tet2-knockout (-KO), Tet2-heterozygous null (-het), or wild type (WT) bone marrow. Mice were subsequently implanted with the syngeneic colorectal adenocarcinoma line MC38 and treated with Programmed Cell Death Protein-1 (PD-1) targeted ICB or Isotype Control (control) antibodies. PD-1 ICB, but not control, treated tumors were significantly smaller in mice with Tet2-het or Tet2-KO versus WT hematopoiesis (Figure 1). There was a trend towards a dose-responsive effect, with more Tet2-het mice responding to PD-1 ICB than wt, and more Tet2-KO mice responding than Tet2-het or wt mice. Therefore, Tet2-mutant leukocytes promote response to PD-1 blockade. PD-1 ICB with targeted cell depletion revealed that the enhanced response in Tet2-het mice requires CD4 + T Cells, CD8 + T Cells and macrophages, but not NK cells. To understand the mechanism through which Tet2-inactivation promotes ICB responses we performed 10X single cell RNA-sequencing on 38,994 CD45 + tumor-infiltrating leukocytes (TILs) from Tet2-het and wt mice treated with PD-1 ICB or control. Tet2-het mutations dramatically changed the TIL landscape with PD-1 blockade by promoting the acquisition of cell fates that drive durable immunotherapy responses including CD8 + effector T cells, CD8 + memory T cells, CD4 + interferon-responsive cells, and macrophages expressing an inflammatory anti-tumour gene signature (Figure 2). In contrast, wt TILs from PD-1 treated tumours were significantly enriched for exhausted CD8 + T cells, CD4 + regulatory T cells, and immunosuppressive macrophages that can promote tumor growth (Figure 2). TIL DNA methylation analysis using Infinium Beadchip arrays revealed promoter hypermethylation in genes defining the immunosuppressive macrophage state. Collectively, this suggests that Tet2-CH reshapes TIL fate following ICB by promoting anti-tumor phenotypes and protecting cells from immunosuppressive states. To investigate the potential clinical relevance of our findings, we retrospectively tested for an association between TET2-CH and immunotherapy outcome in 569 ICB-treated solid tumor patients. CH mutations were detected in publicly-available exome-sequencing data at VAF >0.02 using Mutect2. While CH as a composite of all driver mutations did not correlate with outcome, in multivariate analysis TET2-CH was associated with 6-times greater odds of achieving 6 month clinical benefit in n=205 melanoma patients (95% CI 1.01-66.6). To explore whether TET2-CH might identify patients primed for ICB response, we screened for CH in the prospectively collected baseline PBMCs from 90 solid tumour patients treated in a Phase 2 trial of the PD-1 inhibitor Pembrolizumab (NCT02644369). While underpowered to draw conclusions, we noted that one patient, treated for the skin cancer Merkel Cell Carcinoma, was positive for TET2-CH and responded to ICB, and also survived longer than the cohort median and Merkel Cell Carcinoma median. In summary, our results show that TET2-CH promotes immunotherapy response by shifting TILs from immunosuppressive to anti-tumor fates. Mechanistically, this occurs through lineage-specific promoter hypermethylation and gene silencing. Further study of TET2-CH as a potential biomarker of ICB response is warranted and targeting TET2-regulated pathways may yield novel strategies to improve immunotherapy outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Bench or experimentallow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Bench or experimentalhigh
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation→French-language works237,207→