MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4389235359 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-179375

Rituximab Combined with Chemotherapy and Acalabrutinib Prior to Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Mantle Cell Lymphoma: The Rectangle Trial

2023· article· en· W4389235359 on OpenAlexaffabout
Diego Villa, Jean-François Larouche, Matthew C. Cheung, Mary‐Margaret Keating, Katherine Zukotynski, Samantha Mayo, Robert C. Laister, David W. Scott, John Kuruvilla

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreHôpital de l'Enfant-JésusPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreCentre hospitalier universitaire de QuébecHealth Sciences CentreMcMaster UniversitySpinal Cord Injury BC
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMantle cell lymphomaIbrutinibMedicineRituximabInternal medicineTransplantationOncologyAutologous stem-cell transplantationChemotherapy regimenDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaSurgeryChemotherapyLymphomaLeukemiaChronic lymphocytic leukemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION In the European MCL Network Triangle study (Dreyling, ASH 2022) the addition of ibrutinib to frontline rituximab-containing chemotherapy and subsequent maintenance therapy improved failure-free survival in young, fit patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Ibrutinib was administered with R-CHOP, but not with R-DHAP, during the induction phase. Continuous, uninterrupted Bruton Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) inhibition could maximize the benefit of front-line therapy given that responses develop over time. Acalabrutinib has less off-target BTK inhibition than ibrutinib. We hypothesize that combining continuous acalabrutinib with R-CHOP may result in a tolerable, outpatient, highly active regimen producing favorable outcomes. METHODS NCT04566887 is a phase II, single-arm, open-label study conducted across 5 academic centres in Canada. Patients ≥ 18 years of age with previously untreated MCL, ECOG performance status 0-2, adequate organ function and considered fit for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) were included. Patients received 6 cycles of R-CHOP at standard doses plus acalabrutinib 100 mg twice per day orally. Responding patients proceeded with ASCT and maintenance rituximab and acalabrutinib for a total of 2 years. The primary endpoint was the complete response (CR) rate after 6 cycles of induction with centrally reviewed PET/CT using the Lugano Criteria (Cheson, 2014). The total sample size was n=54 and the study completed accrual in May 2023. We present the results of the first 43 patients who have completed response assessment according to local investigators after 6 cycles of induction. RESULTS The median age was 62 years (range 38 - 69), 26 (60%) were male, 42 (98%) had performance status 0-1, 33 (78%) Ann Arbor stage IV, 35 (81%) bone marrow involvement, 6 (14%) high risk MIPI, 7 (16%) blastoid/pleomorphic morphology, 11 (26%) Ki67 ≥30%. All patients completed 6 cycles of induction and proceeded to ASCT. The overall response rate was 100%, and 39 (91%) patients achieved a CR. All patients started maintenance acalabrutinib + rituximab, although none have yet completed two years of protocol maintenance therapy. With a median follow up of 11.8 months (range 3.4 - 25.3) by the reverse Kaplan-Meier method, the 12-month PFS was 94% (95% CI 78.1 - 98.5), shown in Figure 1, and OS 95.5% (95% CI 71.9 - 99.3). Three subjects have developed PD so far, all with adverse clinical and biological factors: Baseline high-risk MIPI and Ki67 70%; biopsy at relapse TP53 positive by immunohistochemistry (IHC)Baseline intermediate risk MIPI and Ki67 60%; biopsy at relapse with pleomorphic morphology, TP53 positive by IHC, Ki67 100%Baseline high risk MIPI, Ki67 ≥30%, and blastoid morphology. Table 1 lists common grade 3-4 adverse events (AE) during induction and maintenance. There were no grade 5 AE. Neutropenia was the most common AE during induction and maintenance. Most infections were respiratory. Cardiovascular toxicity was uncommon. CONCLUSIONS Acalabrutinib + R-CHOP is associated with a 91% CR rate with low rates of grade 3-4 AE expected for this combination. All patients have proceeded to ASCT and subsequent maintenance therapy. Maintenance therapy in this setting is associated with additional toxicity, particularly cytopenias and infections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→