MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389236792 · doi:10.1139/bcb-2023-0300

18<sup>th</sup> International Conference of Biochemistry &amp; Molecular Biology (18<sup>th</sup> ICBMB)

2023· article· en· W4389236792 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadiochemistryChemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is one of the most common neurological disorders affecting the central nervous system.Globally, there are over 2.5 million cases of MS, with the Middle Eastern and North African nations classified as low-to moderaterisk region for the disease.MS is characterized by chronic inflammation, demyelination, and neurodegeneration, leading to a wide range of clinical symptoms.Neurotrophic factors, such as long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), play crucial roles in the development, survival, and maintenance of neurons.Using real-time PCR, we quantified the expression levels of neurotrophic lncRNAs, focusing on those previously implicated in neuroprotection, synaptic plasticity, and cognitive impairment.Our findings revealed distinct expression profiles of these lncRNAs across different MS subtypes, suggesting their potential involvement in disease pathogenesis and progression.In conclusion, our investigation utilizing real-time PCR highlights the significance of neurotrophic lncRNAs in the context of MS.Further exploration of these lncRNAs and their functional roles may contribute to the development of novel therapeutic strategies for MS patients, ultimately improving their quality of life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.256
Threshold uncertainty score0.857

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2560.145

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicGenetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical ResearchFrench-language works237,207