MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract A030: Blood-based screening panel for lung cancer based on clonal hematopoietic mutations in tumor infiltrating immune cells

2023· article· en· W4389241393 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ramu Anandakrishnan, Ryan Shahidi, Andrew M. Dai, Veneeth Antony

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Immunology Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLung cancerCancerImmune systemMedicineCirculating tumor cellSomatic evolution in cancerHaematopoiesisImmunologyOncologyCancer researchInternal medicineBiologyMetastasisStem cellGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Early detection can significantly reduce mortality due to lung cancer. However, the high cost of the currently approved screening protocol has limited its uptake. Presented here is a blood-based screening panel based on clonal hematopoietic mutations. Mutations in tumor cells that inhibit immune destruction have been extensively studied. However, mutations in immune cells that may prevent an effective anti-tumor immune response remain relatively unstudied. Animal model studies suggest that clonal hematopoietic mutations in tumor infiltrating immune cells can modulate cancer progression, representing potential predictive biomarkers. The goal of this study was to determine if the clonal expansion of these mutations in blood samples could predict the occurrence of lung cancer. We identified a set of 98 potentially pathogenic clonal hematopoietic mutations in tumor infiltrating immune cells. A logistic regression machine learning model based on these mutations correctly classified lung cancer and non-cancer blood samples with 94.12% sensitivity (95% Confidence Interval: 92.20-96.04%) and 85.96% specificity (95% Confidence Interval: 82.98-88.95%) in a test set of 578 lung cancer and 545 non-cancer samples from 18 different cohorts. More importantly, 89.98% of the cancer cases were unambiguously predicted with probability of cancer >0.90 and 74.86% of the non-cancer cases with probability of cancer <0.10. These results suggest that it may be possible to develop an accurate blood-based lung cancer screening panel. Unlike most other “liquid biopsies” currently under development, the assay presented here is based on standard sequencing protocols and uses a relatively small number of rationally selected mutations as predictors. Citation Format: Ramu Anandakrishnan, Ryan Shahidi, Andrew Dai, Veneeth Antony. Blood-based screening panel for lung cancer based on clonal hematopoietic mutations in tumor infiltrating immune cells [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy; 2023 Oct 1-4; Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2023;11(12 Suppl):Abstract nr A030.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.968

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Immunology ResearchSame topicCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207