MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract B169: Retrospective baseline biomarker analyses in a first-in-human Phase 1 trial of the PKMYT1 inhibitor lunresertib (RP-6306) in pts with advanced solid tumors harboring <i>CCNE1</i> amplification and/or deleterious alterations in <i>FBXW7</i> or <i>PPP2R1A</i>

2023· article· en· W4389241646 on OpenAlexaff
Elia Aguado-Fraile, Sunantha Sethuraman, Adam Petrone, Emeline Bacqué, Alison M. Schram, Stéphanie Lheureux, Elizabeth K. Lee, María Koehler, Ian M. Silverman, Victoria Rimkunas, Timothy A. Yap

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Therapeutics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternal medicineMedicineOncologyBiomarkerTolerabilityCyclin E1ConcordanceFluorescence in situ hybridizationCancer researchCancerBiologyCyclin D1Cell cycleAdverse effectGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Lunresertib (RP-6306) is a first-in-class membrane-associated tyrosine- and threonine-specific Cdc2-inhibitory kinase (PKMYT1) inhibitor that disrupts the G2/M checkpoint leading to premature mitosis and catastrophic DNA damage in cells harboring synthetic lethal genomic alterations. The safety and tolerability of lunresertib alone and in combination with camonsertib (RP-3500) is being investigated in the Phase 1 MYTHIC study in patients with advanced solid tumors with either CCNE1 amplifications (amp) or deleterious alterations in FBXW7 or PPP2R1A (NCT04855656). Here, we present a comprehensive retrospective biomarker analysis aimed at understanding concordance between local vs. central and tissue- vs. plasma-based next generation sequencing (NGS). The correlation between CCNE1 copy number assessment by NGS and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), as well as the relationship between CCNE1 amp and Cyclin E1 protein levels, was investigated. Methods: Patients were enrolled based on results from sponsor-approved local tumor NGS and plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) tests. To ensure molecular eligibility criteria were met, local NGS reports were centrally reviewed and functionally annotated prior to enrollment. Tumor tissue and plasma samples collected at screening were retrospectively analyzed by SNiPDx™ and Tempus xF(+), respectively. Tissue samples were further evaluated by FISH and immunohistochemistry. Results: As of June 1, 2023, 145 patients were screened with uterine (23%), colorectal (CRC, 15%), ovarian (13%), and upper GI (6%) as the most frequent cancers. Ninety-four percent (137/145) of patients screened had local NGS results available (98% tissue, 2% plasma). CCNE1 amp (40.1%) were most frequently observed in ovarian, uterine, and upper GI malignancies. FBXW7 (39.4%) and PPP2R1A (16.0%) alterations were enriched in CRC and uterine cancer, respectively. TP53 alterations were frequent across all biomarker groups (76% CCNE1, 54% FBXW7, and 88% PPP2R1A). Central tissue NGS confirmed 94% (47/50) of the enrollment alterations. Central plasma ctDNA confirmed 83.0% (39/47) of FBXW7 and PPP2R1A mutations and had high positive predictive value (100%, 17/17) but low sensitivity (42.5%; 17/40) for CCNE1 amp. CCNE1 amp call and copy number estimation by tissue NGS and FISH were highly correlated (Spearman ρ=0.65, p=0.006). Seventy-five percent of tumors with CCNE1 amp had Cyclin E1 overexpression (H-score ≥100; mean=168; range [0, 300]). Conclusion: In this study, local NGS tests were an efficient and robust strategy for directing patients into a molecularly defined Phase 1 trial. Plasma ctDNA reliably detected alterations in all 3 genes, but caution should be taken when interpreting CCNE1 amplification negative results due to a high false negative rate. FISH and genomics are appropriate methods to estimate CCNE1 amp copy number. These retrospective analyses enable the testing of the synthetic lethal hypothesis of lunresertib and CCNE1, PPP2R1A and FBXW7, assuring reliable interpretation of the clinical data. Citation Format: Elia Aguado-Fraile, Sunantha Sethuraman, Adam Petrone, Emeline Bacque, Alison Schram, Stephanie Lheureux, Elizabeth K Lee, Maria Koehler, Ian M Silverman, Victoria Rimkunas, Timothy A Yap. Retrospective baseline biomarker analyses in a first-in-human Phase 1 trial of the PKMYT1 inhibitor lunresertib (RP-6306) in pts with advanced solid tumors harboring CCNE1 amplification and/or deleterious alterations in FBXW7 or PPP2R1A [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2023 Oct 11-15; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2023;22(12 Suppl):Abstract nr B169.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer TherapeuticsSame topicCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207