Abstract PR003: Repotrectinib in patients with <i>ROS1</i> fusion-positive (<i>ROS1</i>+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Update from the pivotal phase 1/2 TRIDENT-1 trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction: Repotrectinib, a next-generation ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has demonstrated durable activity and manageable safety in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic ROS1+ NSCLC in the pivotal phase 1/2 TRIDENT-1 trial (NCT03093116). We report efficacy with a minimum follow-up of 14 months (mo) from start of treatment in two ROS1+ NSCLC primary efficacy cohorts and safety in all pts treated at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Methods: Pts with ROS1+ NSCLC were assigned to 4 cohorts by treatment history: TKI-naïve, 1 TKI and no chemo, 1 TKI and 1 platinum-based chemo, and 2 TKIs and no chemo. Repotrectinib RP2D was 160 mg once daily for 14 days, then 160 mg twice daily. Phase 2 primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate (cORR) by Blinded Independent Central Review per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), intracranial ORR, cORR in TKI-pretreated pts with ROS1 G2032R NSCLC, and safety. Efficacy analyses included pts with ≥14 mo follow-up. Safety assessments included pts treated at RP2D across all study cohorts. Results: At data cutoff (December 19, 2022), median (range) follow-up in the primary efficacy cohorts was 24.0 (14.2–66.6) mo in the TKI-naïve cohort (n=71) and 21.5 (14.2–58.6) mo in the 1 prior TKI and no chemo cohort (n=56). In the TKI-naïve cohort, cORR was 79% (95% CI, 68–88). Median (95% CI) DOR was 34.1 (25.6–not estimable [NE]) mo; estimated 12- and 18-mo DOR rates were 83% (73–93) and 79% (68–90), respectively. Median PFS (95% CI) was 35.7 (27.4–NE) mo; estimated 12- and 18-mo PFS rates were 77% (66–87) and 70% (59–81), respectively. In the 1 prior TKI and no chemo cohort, cORR was 38% (95% CI, 25–52). Median DOR (95% CI) was 14.8 (7.6–NE) mo; estimated 12-mo DOR rate was 56% (34–77). Median PFS (95% CI) was 9.0 (6.8–19.6) mo; estimated 12-mo PFS rate was 41% (27–56). The median (range) time to response was 1.8 (0.9–5.6) mo in the TKI-naïve cohort and 1.8 (1.6–3.6) mo in the 1 prior TKI and no chemo cohort. Among pts with measurable brain metastasis at baseline, intracranial ORR was 89% (95% CI, 52–100) in the TKI-naïve cohort (n=9), and 38% (95% CI, 14–68) in the 1 prior TKI and no chemo cohort (n=13). In pts with TKI-pretreated ROS1 G2032R NSCLC (n=17), cORR was 59% (33–82). Among pts receiving repotrectinib at RP2D (n=426), treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 422 (99%), most commonly dizziness (62%). Grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 216 (51%) and were considered treatment-related in 122 (29%). TEAEs led to dose reduction and treatment discontinuation in 38% and 7% of pts, respectively. Additional analysis in CNS efficacy and by subsequent therapies will be presented. Conclusion: With a minimum follow-up of 14 mo in TRIDENT-1, repotrectinib continued to demonstrate durable efficacy in pts with ROS1+ NSCLC, including intracranial activity, in both TKI-naïve and 1 prior TKI and no chemo cohorts. Safety in pts treated at RP2D was manageable, consistent with previous reports in all treated pts. Prior:WCLC(Sep 10). Citation Format: Jessica J Lin, Byoung Chul Cho, D. Ross Camidge, Sang-We Kim, Benjamin Solomon, Rafal Dziadziuszko, Benjamin Besse, Koichi Goto, Adrianus Johannes de Langen, Jürgen Wolf, Ki Hyeong Lee, Sanjay Popat, Christoph Springfeld, Misako Nagasaka, Enriqueta Felip, Nong Yang, Shun Lu, Steven Kao, Vamsidhar Velcheti, Parneet Cheema, Shanna Stopatschinskaja, Minal Mehta, Denise Trone, Felipe Ades, Christophe Y. Calvet, Alexander Drilon. Repotrectinib in patients with ROS1 fusion-positive (ROS1+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Update from the pivotal phase 1/2 TRIDENT-1 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2023 Oct 11-15; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2023;22(12 Suppl):Abstract nr PR003.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".