MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4389246847 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-182027

Preliminary Results from a Phase 1b/2 Open-Label, Multicenter, Dose Optimization Clinical Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetic (PK) and Pharmacodynamic (PD) Profiles of Cfi-400945 As a Single Agent or in Combination with Azacitidine in Patients (Pts) with Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndrome or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (TWT-202)

2023· article· en· W4389246847 on OpenAlexaff
Brian A. Jonas, Karen Yee, Alice S. Mims, Paul Koller, Joseph Brandwein, Gail J. Roboz, Glenn Michelson, Linh Nguyen, Mark R. Bray, Emily Roberts-Thomson, Roger Sidhu, Gautam Borthakur

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta HospitalAlberta Hospital EdmontonPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTolerabilityPharmacodynamicsPharmacokineticsInternal medicineOncologyPharmacologyAzacitidineAdverse effectNeutropeniaToxicityBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: CFI-400945 is a potent, selective, orally administered, first-in-class inhibitor of the serine/threonine kinase Polo-like kinase 4 (PLK4), a unique Polo-like kinase family member, that is a conserved upstream regulator of centriole duplication. Dysregulation of PLK4 expression causes loss of centrosome numeral integrity, promotes genomic instability and also potentially enables cancer cells to tolerate genomic instability (Mason et al, Cancer Cell 2014). Its inhibition likely causes mitotic catastrophe. An investigator-initiated study (IIS) demonstrated clinical activity in relapsed/refractory AML with adverse cytogenetics. Dose limiting toxicity was colitis, sepsis and the RP2D 96 mg, three CR's (9 evaluable pts) across 2 dose levels were observed [Data on File, Murphy et al]. We report updated data on a company sponsored study (TWT-202; NCT04730258). Study Design and Methods: TWT-202 is a study of CFI-400945 with 3+3 design in escalation and Simon 2 stage in expansion. For Part 1 (CFI-400945), pts with relapsed and/or refractory AML, MDS, or CMML after >1 prior therapy will be included. Pts with MDS or CMML must have progressed or no response after 4 cycles of hypomethylating agents. For Part 2, (CFI-400945 with azacitidine), pts should have relapsed and/or refractory AML, untreated MDS or CMML. Untreated pts ineligible for intensive therapy may be included. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is defined as the dose where dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) are <1 out of 6 at or below the maximally administered dose. Pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) markers will be assessed. Results: At 2May2023 cut, 26 pts were enrolled into Part 1. Eighteen (69%) pts had AML, 4 (15%) MDS, 4 (15%) CMML. The median number of prior therapies was 3 (range 1-8), 7 (27%) pts had received a previous stem cell transplant. Twenty (77%) were male, the median age 68 years (range 22, 85). Approximately 80% pts with AML were adverse risk by ELN 2022 criteria. Six pts with AML had TP53 mutations. At 21 days on/7 days off schedule, 5 pts received 32mg, 4 pts 48mg, 3 pts 64mg, 5 pts 80mg, 9 pts 96mg daily. The 28 days on/0 days off schedule was introduced at 96mg, 3 pts enrolled, with 0 DLTs to date. There was 1 DLT at 96mg on the 21/7 schedule (fungemia, gastroparesis, septic shock, enteritis). There have been 23 (89%) SAEs with the following occurring in >3 pts (febrile neutropenia (13 pts), sepsis (5 pts), diarrhea (4 pts), pneumonia (4 pts)). Common treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE) in > 5 pts, all grades, all doses; febrile neutropenia-15 pts (58%), nausea-11 pts (42%), diarrhea, vomiting-both 10pts (39%), hypokalemia- 9 pts (35%), dsypnea, hypophosphatemia-8pts each (31%), anemia-7pts (27%), and abdominal pain, fatigue, hypomagnesemia, pneumonia -6 pts each (23%). 31 % (33 events, 8 pts) ≥grade 3 TEAE's were considered related to CFI-400945 . Three pts (50%) with AML (all with prior venetoclax based therapies) at the 96mg dose level (21/7) from 6 evaluable achieved a response after 1 cycle. One pt (85M) with ELN2022 adverse genetics: complex karyotype, TP53 mutation, achieved CRi, and remains in remission after 3 cycles. One pt (70M) with AML (ELN2022 adverse genetics, complex cytogenetics, TP53 mutation), 2 prior regimens, achieved an MLFS and is pending count recovery. Third pt (51M) had AML normal cytogenetics, ELN 2022 adverse genetics (RUNX1, IDH2, SRSF2), and had relapsed/refractory disease after 5 regimens. The pt achieved an MLFS, however medical complications not related to study drug resulted in dose reduction, therapy hold and subsequent relapse. Pharmacokinetic (PK) evaluations indicated mean terminal-life ranged from 7 - 12 hours. Low accumulation was observed after 21d (AR <2-fold). Exposure in this study is overlapped with that observed in the IIS (Data on File, Murphy et al) study. PD studies evaluating the effect of CFI-400945 on markers of mitosis, ploidy and centriole function are ongoing. Conclusion: CFI-400945 has been generally well tolerated in this difficult to treat patient population, including patients whose disease progressed on or following venetoclax based therapies. Three of 6 evaluable patients with AML achieved a response (MLFS=2, CRi=1) at the 96mg dose. PK characteristics support daily dosing of CFI-400945 and PD studies are ongoing. Dose expansions are planned and a combination with azacitidine will open shortly. Murphy et al, Data on File, PMCC Mason et al Cancer Cell 26, 163-176

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research→French-language works237,207→