MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389258570 · doi:10.3171/2023.9.jns231454

Same-day discharge after craniotomy for tumor resection: a retrospective observational single-center study of 630 patients

2023· article· en· W4389258570 on OpenAlexaff
Kristof Nijs, Sydney McQueen, Swati Chhabra, Jesse Goldmacher, Lashmi Venkatraghavan, Mark Bernstein

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of neurosurgery · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEnhanced Recovery After Surgery
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCraniotomyPerioperativeRetrospective cohort studyAmbulatorySurgerySingle CenterVomitingNauseaAnesthesiaObservational studyAnestheticInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Modern neurosurgical developments enable minimally invasive surgery with shorter operation times, faster recovery, and earlier hospital discharge. These in combination with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have the potential to safely shift craniotomy for tumor resection to the ambulatory setting in selected patients. The aim of this retrospective observational single-center study was to assess the success rate of planned same-day discharge from hospital in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial brain tumor resection under general anesthesia or awake craniotomy as well as to explore potential associations with anesthesia techniques, complications, and readmission rates. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients scheduled for same-day discharge after supratentorial craniotomy for tumor resection over 25 years (1996-2021) was performed. Patients were identified for same-day discharge based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data collected included patient demographics, comorbidities, anesthetic data, perioperative complications, and patient dispositions. Data are presented descriptively. RESULTS: A total of 630 patients (mean age 50.9 years; 311 females, 319 males) scheduled for same-day discharge were analyzed. Patients underwent either awake craniotomy (AC; n = 491) or craniotomy under general anesthesia (GA; n = 139). Successful preplanned same-day discharge occurred in 571 (90.6%). Failed same-day discharge happened in 59 patients (GA, n = 14; AC, n = 45). Reasons for failed discharge included the following: new neurological deficit (n = 28); presence of seizure (n = 8); postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV; n = 12); excessive headache (n = 5); and/or social factors (n = 10). Nine patients (1.4%) (GA, n = 0; AC, n = 9) with same-day discharge required readmission to hospital within the first 24 hours after discharge. Reasons for readmission included headache (n = 2), seizure (n = 4), neurological deficit (n = 3), and/or PONV (n = 1); all patients were successfully discharged from hospital after 1 day with no need for reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective, single-center analysis shows that same-day discharge after craniotomy can be safe in carefully selected patients after both GA and AC for tumor resection. Multidisciplinary involvement (surgeons, anesthesiologists, nurses, and other allied health professionals) optimizes success of same-day craniotomy programs. Future optimization of analgesia and prevention of PONV has the potential to increase the success rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.702

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of neurosurgerySame topicEnhanced Recovery After SurgeryFrench-language works237,207