MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4389259058 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-188472

LSD1 Inhibition Enhances Antigen Presentation and Co-Stimulation in AML to Promote T Cell-Mediated Anti-Leukemia Immune Responses

2023· article· en· W4389259058 on OpenAlexaff
Yu Yan, Kanwaldeep Singh, Emily Hartung, Brendan Lee, Pradhariny Prabagaran, Dina Khalaf, Alejandro Garcia‐Horton, Brian Leber, Irwin Walker, Kylie Lepic, Maria Kleppe, Hugh Young Rienhoff, Jonathan L. Bramson, Tobias Berg

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Cell Function and Interaction
Canadian institutionsHamilton Health SciencesJuravinski Cancer CentrePopulation Health Research InstituteMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCIITAMyeloid leukemiaLeukemiaCancer researchAntigenImmune systemStem cellBiologyImmunologyMyeloidFlow cytometryDownregulation and upregulationT cellTransplantationMedicineCell biologyInternal medicineMHC class II

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) can provide a curative treatment option for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Donor T cells play an important role in the curative potential of allo-HSCT by recognizing and eliminating residual leukemic cells, inducing the desirable graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect. Evading from this effect of donor T cell immune surveillance through the downregulation of human leukocyte antigen class II (HLA-II) molecules has been shown to contribute to AML relapse after allo-HSCT. Lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) is an emerging epigenetic therapeutic target in AML due to its role in regulating myeloid differentiation pathways. We hypothesized that LSD1 inhibition has the potential to enhance anti-leukemic immune responses by differentiating AML cells and inducing the acquisition of markers typical for antigen-presenting cells. We have studied these effects by treating human AML cell lines with the LSD1 inhibitor bomedemstat and investigated the expression of antigen-presenting molecules by flow cytometry and quantitative PCR (qPCR). At a concentration of 100 nM, bomedemstat upregulated the expression of CIITA by a log2 fold change of 2.23 ± 0.68 (p < 0.01) in OCI-AML3, 2.17 ± 0.28 (p < 0.01) in HL60 and 1.80 ± 0.67 (p < 0.05) in MOLM-13. To assess if the observed upregulation of CIITA can lead to a re-expression of HLA-DR in these HLA-DR negative cell lines, we then treated these cell lines with 100 nM of bomedemstat with additional IFN-γ stimulation. Expression of HLA-DR and the co-stimulatory molecule CD86 was determined by flow cytometry. Bomedemstat increased the expression of HLA-DR and CD86 across all three cell lines leading to the generation of 26.63 ± 3.07% (p < 0.0001) HLA-DR +/CD86 + cells in OCI-AML3, 4.19 ± 1.68% (p < 0.001) HLA-DR +/CD86 + cells in HL-60 and 14.67 ± 2.03% (p < 0.001) HLA-DR +/CD86 + cells in MOLM-13. We further assessed the effects of bomedemstat treatment on cytokine production by qPCR. Notably, bomedemstat treatment increased the expression of CXCL-10 by a log2 fold change of 2.59 ± 0.66 (p < 0.001) in MOLM-13 and 4.12 ± 0.88 (p < 0.001) in HL-60 at 100 nM concentration. The upregulation of CXCL-10 was also validated using bead-based ELISA assays. To investigate the molecular mechanism of the observed concomitant upregulation of MHC-II molecules and CD86, we then used murine myeloid progenitor cells transformed by overexpression of Hoxa9 and Meis1 (H9M) or MN1. In H9M-transformed cells, bomedemstat concurrently upregulated MHC-II (I-A/I-E) and CD86 even in the absence of IFN-γ stimulation, leading to an increase in MHC-II +/CD86 + cells from 2.52 ± 1.22% at baseline to 29.95 ± 14.11 (p < 0.05). This effect was not observed in MN1-transformed cells. H9M-transformed progenitor cells from Irf8 knockout mice (H9M- Irf8-KO) did not show any upregulation of MHC-II, pointing towards a role for Irf8 in this process. To interrogate whether the concurrent upregulation of MHC-II and CD86 can enhance CD4 + T cell activation, we used ovalbumin-expressing H9M-transformed cells that were co-cultured with OT-II T cells after bomedemstat treatment. We could show that bomedemstat-treatment enhanced the ability of H9M-OVA cells to activate T cells as demonstrated by an enhanced expression of the T cell activation markers CD25 and CD69. Furthermore, bomedemstat also increased the immune killing of OVA-peptide pulsed H9M cells at an effector-to-target (E:T) ratio of 1:1 from 1.12 ± 4.01 to 19.70 ± 6.20% (p < 0.01). It also enhanced the killing of OVA-expressing H9M cells from 5.80 ± 2.95% to 17.70 ± 3.16% (p < 0.05). No significant killing effect was observed for MN1 cells. In conclusion, we demonstrate both phenotypically and functionally that LSD1 inhibition by bomedemstat can enhance the immunogenicity of human and murine AML models. These findings point towards a potential role of LSD1 inhibition as a maintenance therapy after allo-HSCT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicImmune Cell Function and Interaction→French-language works237,207→