Bibliographic record
Abstract
We consider bounded weight modules for the universal central extension ${\mathfrak{sl}}_2(J)$ of the Tits-Kantor-Koecher algebra of a unital Jordan algebra $J$. Universal objects called Weyl modules are introduced and studied, and a combinatorial dominance criterion is given for analogues of highest weights. Specializing $J$ to the free Jordan algebra $J(r)$ of rank $r$, the category $\mathcal{C}^{fin}$ of finite-dimensional $\mathbb{Z}$-graded ${\mathfrak{sl}}_2(J)$-modules shares many properties with the representation theory of algebraic groups. Using a deep result of Zelmanov, we show that this subcategory admits Weyl modules. By analogy, we conjecture that $\mathcal{C}^{fin}$ is a highest weight category. The resulting homological properties would then imply cohomological vanishing results previously conjectured as a way of determining graded dimensions of free Jordan algebras.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".