MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389263539 · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2023.1267007

Analysis of the effects of bench-scale cell culture platforms and inoculum cell concentrations on PSC aggregate formation and culture

2023· article· en· W4389263539 on OpenAlexafffund
Diepiriye G. Iworima, Robert K. Baker, James M. Piret, Timothy J. Kieffer

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPluripotent Stem Cells Research
Canadian institutionsCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreUniversity of British Columbia
FundersBreakthrough T1D CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchStem Cell Network
KeywordsCell cultureChemistryAggregate (composite)Scale (ratio)BiologyMaterials scienceNanotechnologyGeographyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) provide many opportunities for application in regenerative medicine due to their ability to differentiate into cells from all three germ layers, proliferate indefinitely, and replace damaged or dysfunctional cells. However, such cell replacement therapies require the economical generation of clinically relevant cell numbers. Whereas culturing hPSCs as a two-dimensional monolayer is widely used and relatively simple to perform, their culture as suspended three-dimensional aggregates may enable more economical production in large-scale stirred tank bioreactors. To be more relevant to this biomanufacturing, bench-scale differentiation studies should be initiated from aggregated hPSC cultures. Methods: We compared five available bench-scale platforms for generating undifferentiated cell aggregates of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) using AggreWell™ plates, low attachment plates on an orbital shaker, roller bottles, spinner flasks, and vertical-wheel bioreactors (PBS-Minis). Thereafter, we demonstrated the incorporation of an hPSC aggregation step prior to directed differentiation to pancreatic progenitors and endocrine cells. Results and discussion: The AggreWell™ system had the highest aggregation yield. The initial cell concentrations had an impact on the size of aggregates generated when using AggreWell™ plates as well as in roller bottles. However, aggregates made with low attachment plates, spinner flasks and PBS-Minis were similar regardless of the initial cell number. Aggregate morphology was compact and relatively homogenously distributed in all platforms except for the roller bottles. The size of aggregates formed in PBS-Minis was modulated by the agitation rate during the aggregation. In all cell culture platforms, the net growth rate of cells in 3D aggregates was lower (range: −0.01–0.022 h −1 ) than cells growing as a monolayer (range: 0.039–0.045 h −1 ). Overall, this study describes operating ranges that yield high-quality undifferentiated hESC aggregates using several of the most commonly used bench-scale cell culture platforms. In all of these systems, methods were identified to obtain PSC aggregates with greater than 70% viability, and mean diameters between 60 and 260 mm. Finally, we showed the capacity of hPSC aggregates formed with PBS-Minis to differentiate into viable pancreatic progenitors and endocrine cell types.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Bioengineering and BiotechnologySame topicPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchFrench-language works237,207