Review of: "Resentment and Multiculturalism: Kymlicka’s Canada, Bonilla Maldonado’s Colombia and Modood’s UK"
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The genesis of the concept of Multiculturalism can be traced back to the black consciousness movement in the US in the 1960's. Ethnoculturalism, established cultural groups in various parts of the world as well as cultural and ethnic diversity of most of the Western societies-have all coalesced to the growth of the concept of Multiculturalism. Multiculturalism signifies primarily a celebration of cultural diversity, which usually springs from ethnic, racial and language differences. It not only strengthen one's own culture, but also emphasizes the tolerance and respect for other cultures and regions. This paper by Patrick Imbert compares and contrasts the concept of Multiculturalism as reflected in Will Kymlicka's Canada, Maldonado's Colombia and Modood's United Kingdom. Kymlicka combines the ideas of community and cultural membership in his Advocacy of 'Multicultural Citizenship'. It is based upon the assumption that 'cultures are valuable and distinct and provide a context in which individuals are provided with meaning, identity, orientation and belonging'. In other words, it essentially advocates cultural distinctiveness. Patrick Imbert draws some of the common analogies which can be deduced through Multiculturalism in Canada, Colombia and the UK. The author brilliantly provide man fresh insights into the concept of Multiculturalism and their concomitant resentment. This paper makes a very interesting reading.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".