Predictors of Perioperative Complications During Leo Baby Stent Treatment for Acutely Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Retrospective Multicenter Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Stent-assisted coiling (SAC) of acutely ruptured aneurysms has been controversial. Moreover, for aneurysms originating from small diameter vessels, the SAC presents more challenges. This study aimed to investigate the predictors of perioperative complications after SAC with Leo baby stent of acutely ruptured aneurysms. METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicenter analysis of 425 patients with acutely ruptured aneurysms treated with Leo baby. We compared clinical characteristics and outcomes among patients with perioperative complications and those without. Subgroup analysis, including thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications, was also performed. RESULTS: Immediate postoperative angiograms showed Raymond 1 in 357 aneurysms (84.2%), 2 in 53 (12.5%), and 3 in 14 (3.3%). A total of 372 patients (87.5%) were independent (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score 0-2) at discharge. Perioperative complications occurred in 18 cases (4.2%) harboring 13 cases (3.1%) of thromboembolic complications and 5 cases (1.2%) of hemorrhagic complications. Patients with perioperative complications had a higher rate of unfavorable outcomes at discharge ( P = .018), especially with thromboembolic complications ( P = .043). Multivariate analysis showed that higher preoperative mRS score ( P = .004), irregular shape ( P = .017), and larger aneurysms ( P = .049) were independent predictors of the overall complications, whereas higher preoperative mRS score ( P = .022) was an independent predictor for ischemic complications. The follow-up angiogram was available for 245 patients, and the follow-up angiograms revealed Raymond 1 in 223 aneurysms (91.0%), 2 in 19 (7.8%), and 3 in 3 (1.2%). CONCLUSION: Worse clinical condition, irregular shape, and larger aneurysms were independently associated with overall complications, whereas worse clinical condition was viewed as an independent predictor for thromboembolic complications. Attention to these factors is essential for the safe treatment and prognosis of patients with acutely ruptured aneurysms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".