MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389310858 · doi:10.1089/neu.2023.0257

Spatial Hotspots and Sociodemographic Profiles Associated With Traumatic Brain Injury in Nova Scotia

2023· article· en· W4389310858 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nelofar Kureshi, Syed Sibte Raza Abidi, David B. Clarke, Weiping Zeng, Cindy Feng

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurotrauma · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrauma and Emergency Care Studies
Canadian institutionsSaskatchewan PolytechnicDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTraumatic brain injuryGeographyPoison controlDemographyInjury preventionSocioeconomic statusMedicineEnvironmental healthCartographyPopulationPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability, primarily caused by falls and motor vehicle collisions (MVCs). Although many TBIs are preventable, there is a notable lack of studies exploring the association of geographically defined TBI hotspots with social deprivation. Geographic information systems (GIS) can be used to identify at-risk neighborhoods (hotspots) for targeted interventions. This study aims to determine the spatial distribution of TBI by major causes and to explore the sociodemographic and economic characteristics of TBI hotspots and cold spots in Nova Scotia. Patient data for TBIs from 2003 to 2019 were obtained from the Nova Scotia Trauma Registry. Residential postal codes were geocoded and assigned to dissemination areas (DA). Area-based risk factors and deprivation status (residential instability [RI], economic dependency [ED], ethnocultural composition [EC], and situational vulnerability [SV]) from the national census data were linked to DAs. Spatial autocorrelation was assessed using Moran's I, and hotspot analysis was performed using Getis-Ord Gi* statistic. Differences in risk factors between hot and cold spots were evaluated using the Mann–Whitney U test for numerical variables and the χ 2 test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. A total of 5394 TBI patients were eligible for inclusion in the study. The distribution of hotspots for falls exhibited no significant difference between urban and rural areas ( p = 0.71). Conversely, hotspots related to violence were predominantly urban ( p = 0.001), whereas hotspots for MVCs were mostly rural ( p < 0.001). Distinct dimensions of deprivation were associated with falls, MVCs, and violent hotspots. Fall hotspots were significantly associated with areas characterized by higher RI ( p < 0.001) and greater ethnocultural diversity ( p < 0.001). Conversely, the same domains exhibited an inverse relationship with MVC hotspots; areas with low RI and ethnic homogeneity displayed a higher proportion of MVC hotspots. ED and SV exhibited a strong gradient with MVC hotspots; the most deprived quintiles displayed the highest proportion of MVC hotspots compared with cold spots (ED; p = 0.002, SV; p < 0.001). Areas with the highest levels of ethnocultural diversity were found to have a significantly higher proportion of violence-related hotspots than cold spots ( p = 0.005). This study offers two significant contributions to spatial epidemiology. First, it demonstrates the distribution of TBI hotspots by major injury causes using the smallest available geographical unit. Second, we disentangle the various pathways through which deprivation impacts the risk of main mechanisms of TBI. These findings provide valuable insights for public health officials to design targeted injury prevention strategies in high-risk areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.214
Threshold uncertainty score0.430

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeurotraumaSame topicTrauma and Emergency Care StudiesFrench-language works237,207