MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389320109 · doi:10.55016/ojs/ajer.v64i2.56384

Community-Supported Learning: Practicums, Adult Education and Post-Secondary Institutions

2018· article· en· W4389320109 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Jennifer Sumner

Bibliographic record

VenueAlberta Journal of Educational Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education Learning Practices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPracticumInstitutionSociologyAdult educationExperiential learningPedagogyHumanitiesAdult LearningSocial sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Practicums are a form of adult education that moves the post-secondary institution beyond the classroom and into the community. As adult learning experiences, they are unparalleled, combining the resources of the academy with the opportunities of the wider world. This paper will explore the links between adult education and post-secondary institutions through the phenomenon of the practicum. Using a tripartite lens of social, experiential and workplace learning, it will examine a particular practicum course to understand how it enables communities of practice – ongoing processes of collective learning in a shared domain of human endeavour (Wenger, 2011). These communities of practice, in turn, foster what can be understood as community-supported learning, part of the foundation of ‘really useful knowledge’ that characterizes the broad and vital mission of adult education. Les stages sont une forme d’éducation des adultes qui sort l’apprentissage postsecondaire de la salle de classe et la situe dans la communauté. En tant qu’expériences d’apprentissage pour les adultes, ils sont inégalés, alliant les ressources d’une institution académique aux occasions du reste du monde. Cet article explorera les liens entre l’éducation des adultes et les institutions postsecondaires par le biais du phénomène des stages. S’appuyant sur la perspective tripartite de l’apprentissage social, expérientiel et en milieu de travail, l’article examinera un stage en particulier de sorte à comprendre comment il rend possible des communautés de pratique – des processus permanents d’apprentissage collectif dans une sphère partagée d’activité humaine (Wenger, 2011). Ces communautés de pratique, à leur tour, favorisent ce qu’on peut nommer l’apprentissage appuyé par la communauté, composante du fondement de « connaissances très utiles » qui caractérisent la mission élargie et vitale qu’est celle de l’éducation des adultes. Mots clés : stage, éducation des adultes, apprentissage appuyé par la communauté

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.113
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.719
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.113
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.512
Teacher spread0.384 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlberta Journal of Educational ResearchSame topicHigher Education Learning PracticesFrench-language works237,207