MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389329452 · doi:10.1002/marc.202300602

Toward High‐Performance Piezoresistive Polymer Derived SiOC Ceramics through Masked Stereolithography 3D Printing with β‐Silicon Carbide Nanopowder Reinforcement

2023· article· en· W4389329452 on OpenAlexafffund
Md Sazzadur Rahman, Arindam Phani, Seonghwan Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Rapid Communications · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsMaterials sciencePiezoresistive effectStereolithographySilicon carbideFabricationCeramicComposite materialGauge factorNanocomposite3D printingComposite numberPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Enhancing the piezoresistivity of polymer‐derived silicon oxycarbide ceramics (SiOC PDC ) is of great interest in the advancement of highly sensitive pressure/load sensor technology for use in harsh and extreme working conditions. However, a facile, low cost, and scalable approach to fabricate highly piezoresistive SiOC PDC below 1400 °C still remains a great challenge. Here, the fabrication and enhancement of piezoresistive properties of SiOC PDC reinforced with β‐SiC nanopowders (SiC NP ) through masked stereolithography‐based 3D‐printing and subsequent pyrolysis at 1100 °C are demonstrated. The presence of free carbon in SiC NP augments high piezoresistivity in the fabricated SiC NP ‐SiOC PDC composites even at lower pyrolysis temperatures. A gauge factor (GF) in the range of 4385–5630 and 6129–8987 with 0.25 and 0.50 wt% of SiC NP , respectively is demonstrated, for an applied pressure range of 0.5–5 MPa at ambient working conditions. The reported GF is significantly higher compared to those of any existing SiOC PDC materials. This rapid and facile fabrication route with significantly enhanced piezoresistive properties makes the 3D‐printed SiC NP ‐SiOC PDC composite a promising high‐performance material for the detection of pressure/load in demanding applications. Also, the overall robustness in mechanical properties and load‐bearing capability ensures its long‐term stability and makes it suitable for challenging and severe environment applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.512
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromolecular Rapid CommunicationsSame topicAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207