Associations between human milk oligosaccharides and infant growth in a Bangladeshi mother–infant cohort
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We aimed to estimate associations between human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs) and infant growth (length-for-age (LAZ) and weight-for-length (WLZ) z-scores) at 12 months postnatal age. METHODS: In this secondary analysis of data from a maternal vitamin D trial in Dhaka, Bangladesh (N = 192), absolute concentrations of HMOs were measured in 13 ± 1 week(s) postpartum milk samples, infant anthropometric measurements were obtained soon after birth and at 12 months postpartum, and infant feeding was classified during 6 months postpartum. Associations between individual HMOs or HMO groups and LAZ or WLZ were estimated by multivariable linear regression adjusting for infant feeding pattern, maternal secretor status, and other potential confounders. RESULTS: The concentrations of 6'sialyllactose, lacto-N-neotetraose, and the non-fucosylated non-sialylated HMOs were inversely associated with LAZ at 12 months of age, whereas the fucosylated non-sialylated HMO concentration was positively associated with LAZ at 12 months. These associations were robust in analyses restricted to infants who were primarily exclusively/predominantly fed human milk during the first 3 (or 6) months. CONCLUSIONS: Since HMOs are both positively and negatively associated with postnatal growth, there is a need for randomized trials to estimate the causal benefits and risks of exogenously administered HMOs on infant growth and other health outcomes. IMPACT: 6'sialyllactose, lacto-N-neotetraose, and the non-fucosylated non-sialylated human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs) were inversely associated with length-for-age z-scores (LAZ) at 12 months, whereas the fucosylated non-sialylated HMO concentration was positively associated with LAZ at 12 months among Bangladeshi infants. Associations between individual and grouped HMOs with infant length growth at 12 months were as strong or stronger in analyses restricted to infants who were exclusively or predominantly fed human milk up to 3 (or 6) months. Randomized trials are needed to characterize the effects of specific HMOs on infant growth, particularly in countries where postnatal linear growth faltering is common.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".