Bilayer and Trilayer C<sub>3</sub>N/Blue-Phosphorene Heterostructures as Potential Anode Materials for Potassium-Ion Batteries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Two-dimensional (2D) van der Waals heterostructures outperform conventional anode materials for postlithium-ion batteries in terms of mechanical, thermal, and electrochemical properties. This study systemically investigates the performance of bilayer and trilayer C 3 N/blue phosphorene (C 3 N/BlueP) heterostructures as anode materials for potassium-ion batteries (KIBs) using first-principles density functional theory calculations. This study reveals that the adsorption and diffusion of K ions on bilayer and trilayer C 3 N/BlueP heterostructures are markedly superior to those of their monolayer counterparts. A bilayer heterostructure (C 3 N/BlueP) effectively reduces the bandgap of the BlueP monolayer (1.98 eV) to 0.02 eV, whereas trilayer heterostructures (bilayer-C 3 N/BlueP and C 3 N/bilayer-BlueP) exhibit metallic behavior with no bandgap. Additionally, the theoretical capacity of the bilayer and trilayer heterostructures ranges from 636.7 to 755.5 mA h g –1, considerably higher than the theoretical capacity of other prospective 2D heterostructures for KIBs investigated in the literature. This study also shows that the heterostructures exhibit K-ion diffusion barriers as low as 0.042 eV, ensuring the relatively fast diffusion of K ions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".