MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Understanding the Surface Discharge Characteristics with Thermally Aged Ester Fluid Impregnated Pressboard Adopting Fluorescent Fiber Technique

2023· article· en· W4389332322 on OpenAlexaff
Leena Gautam, R. Sarathi, Palanisamy Soundarya, Govindasamy Sekar, U. Mohan Rao, I. Fofana

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHigh voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena
Canadian institutionsCégep de ChicoutimiUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPressboardMaterials sciencePartial dischargeComposite materialAcoustic emissionUltra high frequencyKraft paperTransformerFiberFluorescenceInsulation systemVoltageAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Electronic engineeringElectrical engineeringOpticsChemistryChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Surface discharge activity in transformers has an effect to permanently degrade the insulation structure. Early detection of these discharge is crucial for system reliability where Ultra high frequency (UHF) sensor and fluorescent fiber technique show good signal to noise ratio and better sensitivity. An accelerated thermal ageing is carried as per IEC 61125 at a temperature of 160°C. Surface discharge inception voltage (SDIV) and Phase-resolved partial discharge (PRPD) studies have been carried out for thermally aged natural ester oil impregnated pressboard (OIP), by adopting fluorescent fiber technique in comparison with the UHF technique. The optical emission spectroscopy (OES) identifies the emission spectrum of elements during the discharge activity, where a machine learning tool is employed to classify the specimens based on its ageing period. Further, characteristic variation in properties of thermally aged pressboard were analyzed through thermal analysis and solid-NMR studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHigh voltage insulation and dielectric phenomenaFrench-language works237,207