LA DÉCISION CHRISTENSEN c. ARCHEVÊQUE CATHOLIQUE ROMAIN : LORSQUE LE TUTEUR DOIT POURSUIVRE L’AGRESSEUR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le délai entre le moment où elle subit des actes d’agression et celui où la victime de telles agressions entame des procédures judiciaires civiles peut parfois être de quelques décennies, surtout si elle était mineure au moment des agressions. La prescription du recours de la victime d’agression sexuelle a ceci de singulier que l’extinction du droit de poursuivre peut survenir avant même que la victime n’ait été en mesure d’établir le lien entre les actes fautifs et le préjudice souffert. La question de l’impossibilité d’agir des parents, comme motif de suspension de la prescription suscite plusieurs questions liées au rôle du tuteur et à la protection de l’enfant. L’analyse de la décision Christensen c. Archevêque catholique romain de Québec nous permet de remettre en contexte la délicate question des agressions sexuelles d’enfants, à la lueur notamment de la Convention sur les droits de l'enfant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".