An integrated strategy involving high‐throughput sequencing to characterize an unknown GM wheat event in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Glyphosate-resistant wheat plants were discovered in southern Alberta in 2017, representing an unauthorized GM release in Canada. The Canadian Food Inspection Agency undertook a series of experiments to characterize and identify this unknown GM wheat, as well as to develop and validate construct-specific and event-specific qPCR assays. Results of PCR-based assays and Sanger sequencing indicated the presence of CaMV 35S promoter (p35S), Rice Actin 1 intron (RactInt1), CP4-EPSPS gene and nopaline synthase terminator (tNOS) elements in the unknown GM wheat. Genome walking and bead capture strategies, combined with high-throughput sequencing, were used to identify the 5' and 3' wheat junctions and the subsequent mapping of the insert to chromosome 3B of the wheat genome. A probable transformation vector, pMON25497, was recognized, and further testing identified the unknown GM wheat as MON71200 event, one of two events obtained with the pMON25497 vector. The two construct-specific assays targeted the junctions of the RactInt1 and the CP4-EPSPS elements and the CP4-EPSPS and tNOS elements, while the event-specific assay was located at the 3' junction into the wheat genome. Both construct-specific and event-specific assays had limits of detection of 0.10% of MON71200 in a seed pool. As expected, the two construct-specific assays cross-reacted with other wheat and corn events containing the same elements in the same order. No cross-reactivity was observed for the event-specific assay. The integrated strategy employed in this study can serve as a model for other cases when facing similar challenges involving unknown GM events.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".