MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Transradial Versus Transfemoral Access for Woven EndoBridge (WEB) Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Propensity-Score Matched Multicenter Study (P1-1.Virtual)

2022· article· en· W4389366424 on OpenAlexaff
Mahmoud Dibas, Nimer Adeeb, Jose Danilo Bengzon Diestro, Hugo Cuellar, Ahmad Sweid, Sovann V. Lay, Adrien Guenego, Asala Aslan, Leonardo Renieri, Sri Hari Sundararajan, Guillaume Saliou, Markus Möhlenbruch, Robert W. Regenhardt, Justin E. Vranic, Iván Lylyk, Paul M. Foreman, Jay A. Vachhani, Vedran Župančić, Muhammad Ubaid Hafeez, Caleb Rutledge, Muhammad Waqas, Vincent M. Tutino, James D. Rabinov, Yifan Ren, Clemens M. Schirmer, Mariangela Piano, Anna Luisa Kühn, Caterina Michelozzi, Stéphanie Elens, Robert M. Starke, Ameer E Hassan, Arsalaan Salehani, Peter B. Sporns, Jesse Jones, Marios Psychogios, Julian Spears, Boris Lubicz, Pietro Panni, Ajit S Puri, Guglielmo Pero, Christoph J. Griessenauer, Hamed Asadi, Christopher J. Stapleton, Adnan H. Siddiqui, Andrew F. Ducruet, Felipe C. Albuquerque, Peter Kan, Vladimir Kalousek, Pedro Lylyk, Srikanth Boddu, Jared Knopman, Mohammad Ali Aziz‐Sultan, Nicola Limbucci, Pascal Jabbour, Christophe Cognard, Aman B. Patel, Adam A. Dmytriw

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVascular Procedures and Complications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPropensity score matchingMedicineEmbolizationMulticenter studyRadiologySurgeryRandomized controlled trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aimed to compare the technical and clinical outcomes between the transradial access (TRA) and transfemoral access (TFA) for WEB embolization of intracranial aneurysms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.394
Threshold uncertainty score0.612

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicVascular Procedures and ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207