Clinical efficacy and safety of endovascular treatment for patients with wake-up stroke with large vessel occlusion guided by NCCT-ASPECTS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of 6 to 24 h endovascular therapy (EVT) in patients with wake-up stroke (WUS) with acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) of the anterior circulation guided by noncontrast computed tomography-Alberta stroke program early CT score (NCCT-ASPECTS).MethodsFifty-three patients with WUS with acute LVO of the anterior circulation who were treated at the Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang Medical College from January 2018 to March 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into NCCT-ASPECTS or CT perfusion groups. Baseline data, perioperative data, and 90-d prognostic information were compared between the two groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine the independent factors influencing outcomes.ResultsThere were no significant differences in the good prognosis, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality rates between the two groups (P > 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the puncture-recanalization time was an independent factor for good prognosis.ConclusionBased on NCCT-ASPECTS guidance, EVT in patients with WUS for acute LVO of the anterior circulation within 6 to 24 h may be safe and effective.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".