MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389381226 · doi:10.26886/2524-101x.9.5.2023.2

Damage to the Maritime Ecosystems from the Destruction of the Kakhovka Dam and International Mechanisms of its Assessment

2023· article· en· W4389381226 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Borys Babin, Oleksii Plotnikov, Anna Prykhodko

Bibliographic record

VenueLex Portus · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAquatic and Environmental Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEcosystemEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental planningBusinessEnvironmental scienceEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article focuses on possible mechanisms of international legal responsibility for the destruction of the dam of the Kakhovka Hydroelectric Power Plant that happened in 2023 during the Russian aggression of Ukraine, Russian occupation, and attempted annexation of the Kherson Region. The authors described the realization norms of international humanitarian, criminal, maritime, ecological, and human rights law in the current reality of Ukraine and other Black Sea states. The article describes the relevant demands of Regulations concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land as annex to the Hague Convention (IV), Rome Statute and Geneva Conventions, Elements of Crime of International Criminal Court, UN Convention of the Law of the Sea and relevant ecologic conventions, activities of Ukrainian legal enforcement bodies and human rights defenders, also as ecocide crime conception. Authors stress the role of OSCE Parliamentary Assembly Vancouver Declaration, 2023, of PACE Resolution “Political consequences of the Russian Federation’s war of aggression against Ukraine” 2506 (2023), of European Parliament Resolution “On the Sustainable Reconstruction and Integration of Ukraine into the Euro-Atlantic Community,” 2023/2739 (RSP) and International Crimea Platform activities. The relevant ecologic and maritime legal procedures might not necessarily result in international courts and that the absence of international criminal responsibility for ecocide makes natural perspectives for relevant responsibility just in the framework of relevant war crime pointed out in Article 8(2)(b)(iv) of Rome Statute or on a national legal level. At the same time, a set of international bodies’ resolutions adopted mentioned the Kakhovka case. It connected it with ecocide, an international crime that shall make a relevant impulse for developing relevant international legal concepts at a minimum on a doctrinal level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLex PortusSame topicAquatic and Environmental StudiesFrench-language works237,207