MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389382548 · doi:10.1109/twc.2023.3335362

Hybrid Online–Offline Learning for Task Offloading in Mobile Edge Computing Systems

2023· article· en· W4389382548 on OpenAlexafffund
Muhammad Sohaib, Sang-Woon Jeon, Wei Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersKorea Evaluation Institute of Industrial TechnologyNational Fire AgencyMinistry of the Interior and SafetyCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsComputer scienceMobile edge computingEdge computingTask (project management)Mobile computingEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionComputer networkMultimediaDistributed computingHuman–computer interactionArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider a multi-user multi-server mobile edge computing (MEC) system, in which users arrive on a network randomly over time and generate computation tasks, which will be computed either locally on their own computing devices or be offloaded to one of the MEC servers. Under such a dynamic network environment, we propose a novel task offloading policy based on hybrid online–offline learning, which can efficiently reduce the overall computation delay and energy consumption only with information available at nearest MEC servers from each user. We provide a practical signaling and learning framework that can train deep neural networks for both online and offline learning and can adjust its offloading policy based on the queuing status of each MEC server and network dynamics. Numerical results demonstrate that the proposed scheme significantly reduces the average computation delay for a broad class of network environments compared to the conventional offloading methods. It is further shown that the proposed hybrid online–offline learning framework can be extended to a general cost function reflecting both delay- and energy-dependent metrics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.891
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Wireless CommunicationsSame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207